Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41064242›Full record

ArticlePNAS nexus2025

Unveiling the relationship between aesthetic experiences and attention through a cross-experiment validation of their processing biomarkers.

Paolo Barbieri, Martina Berto, Pietro Sarasso, Jacopo Frascaroli, Giacomo Handjaras, Francesca Piovesan, Giorgio Gnecco, Davide Bottari, Irene Ronga

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PNAS nexus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Paolo BarbieriBIP (BraIn Plasticity and Behaviour Changes) Research Group, Department of Psychology, University of Turin, 10124 Turin, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1899-304X
Martina BertoMolecular Mind Lab, IMT School for Advanced Studies Lucca, 55100 Lucca, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0091-668X
Pietro SarassoBIP (BraIn Plasticity and Behaviour Changes) Research Group, Department of Psychology, University of Turin, 10124 Turin, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0859-7764
Jacopo FrascaroliBIP (BraIn Plasticity and Behaviour Changes) Research Group, Department of Psychology, University of Turin, 10124 Turin, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2517-7158
Giacomo HandjarasMolecular Mind Lab, IMT School for Advanced Studies Lucca, 55100 Lucca, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5677-8434
Francesca PiovesanBIP (BraIn Plasticity and Behaviour Changes) Research Group, Department of Psychology, University of Turin, 10124 Turin, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-4977-4336
Giorgio GneccoAXES Research Unit, IMT School for Advanced Studies Lucca, 55100 Lucca, Italy.
Davide BottariMolecular Mind Lab, IMT School for Advanced Studies Lucca, 55100 Lucca, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6843-1569
Irene RongaBIP (BraIn Plasticity and Behaviour Changes) Research Group, Department of Psychology, University of Turin, 10124 Turin, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2960-4639

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A centuries-old tradition encompassing philosophy, psychology, and artistic practice describes aesthetic experiences as characterized by a special state of heightened attention toward external stimuli (i.e. an "aesthetic attitude"). In recent years, this view has motivated wide-ranging claims about the nature of our aesthetic encounters and the cognitive benefits of exposure to art. Despite sustained efforts from a growing stream of interdisciplinary research, however, it is still unclear whether aesthetic experiences can be systematically linked to observable attentional enhancements. In this study, we address this long-standing question using electroencephalography (EEG) and advanced machine learning (ML) techniques. We performed a series of EEG experiments measuring brain activity elicited by synthetic and natural images during an aesthetic (beauty judgments) and a pragmatic (symmetry judgments) task. Visual evoked potentials and neural oscillations were used to assess whether the aesthetic task induces attentional enhancements. In line with our hypotheses, the power of alpha and beta prestimulus oscillations significantly decreased in the aesthetic vs. pragmatic task. Furthermore, larger late positive potentials and N170 responses (the latter for natural images only) were found in the aesthetic vs. pragmatic task. ML analyses further showed that prestimulus neural oscillations and N170 responses were systematically able to predict the type of task. Overall, our results highlight the presence of a perceptual processing enhancement and a heightened state of attention in aesthetic contexts. The upshot is a clearer understanding of the dynamics and neural underpinnings of our aesthetic experiences.

Indexed as

aesthetic attitudeattentionevent-related potential (ERP)machine learningneuroaesthetics

Identifiers

PMID41064242
PMCPMC12501847

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.