ArticlePNAS nexus2025
Unveiling the relationship between aesthetic experiences and attention through a cross-experiment validation of their processing biomarkers.
Article in PNAS nexus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Neuroaesthetics: exploring the role of aesthetic experience in neurorehabilitation.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A centuries-old tradition encompassing philosophy, psychology, and artistic practice describes aesthetic experiences as characterized by a special state of heightened attention toward external stimuli (i.e. an "aesthetic attitude"). In recent years, this view has motivated wide-ranging claims about the nature of our aesthetic encounters and the cognitive benefits of exposure to art. Despite sustained efforts from a growing stream of interdisciplinary research, however, it is still unclear whether aesthetic experiences can be systematically linked to observable attentional enhancements. In this study, we address this long-standing question using electroencephalography (EEG) and advanced machine learning (ML) techniques. We performed a series of EEG experiments measuring brain activity elicited by synthetic and natural images during an aesthetic (beauty judgments) and a pragmatic (symmetry judgments) task. Visual evoked potentials and neural oscillations were used to assess whether the aesthetic task induces attentional enhancements. In line with our hypotheses, the power of alpha and beta prestimulus oscillations significantly decreased in the aesthetic vs. pragmatic task. Furthermore, larger late positive potentials and N170 responses (the latter for natural images only) were found in the aesthetic vs. pragmatic task. ML analyses further showed that prestimulus neural oscillations and N170 responses were systematically able to predict the type of task. Overall, our results highlight the presence of a perceptual processing enhancement and a heightened state of attention in aesthetic contexts. The upshot is a clearer understanding of the dynamics and neural underpinnings of our aesthetic experiences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.