SynthesisJournal of pregnancy2025
Laboratory and Clinical Values of the Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio in Women With Hyperemesis Gravidarum: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Journal of pregnancy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Hyperemesis gravidarum (HG), which is characterized by severe nausea and vomiting, can lead to maternal complications and adverse fetal outcomes. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is a potentially simple and cost-effective marker for detecting this condition. The aim of this study was to consolidate the current evidence regarding the utility of NLR in diagnosing and assessing the severity of HG. Methods: A systematic search of Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Google Scholar was conducted before March 2024. The selected articles were reviewed. Analytical cross-sectional studies reporting NLR values in patients with HG were included. Two independent authors reviewed the articles and assessed them for bias. A meta-analysis with random effects was conducted to compare NLR values between HG and healthy patients and to evaluate its association with the severity of symptoms assessed through the modified Pregnancy-Unique Quantification of Emesis, such as ketonuria and C-reactive protein levels. The GRADE system determined the certainty of the evidence. Results: Fifteen studies were included, predominantly case-control. Pooled analysis revealed a significant elevation in NLR among patients with HG compared with healthy pregnant women (MD: 1.76; 95% CI: 1.15-2.37; Discussion: With low certainty, the mean NLR was higher in patients with HG than in healthy pregnant women, with moderate certainty regarding severity. These findings suggest the potential utility of NLR; however, further research on neonatal and long-term outcomes is needed. Precis: These results indicate that NLR could be useful, but additional studies are necessary to understand its impact on neonatal and long-term outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.