ReviewFrontiers in artificial intelligence2025
Data quality challenges of AIGC application in smart agriculture.
Review in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In recent years, China's agricultural development has gradually shifted from digital agriculture to smart agriculture. At the same time, with the participation of AIGC, the decision-making system of smart agriculture is also facing numerous data challenges. In this study, we employed a comprehensive quality improvement approach to ad-dress these challenges. The methodology involves three phases: (1) Detection and removal of data noise through advanced cleaning techniques and preprocessing methods; (2) Unified data standards and formats to ensure seamless integration across di-verse data sources; and (3) Strengthening agricultural infrastructure to prevent data islands and promote equitable data distribution. Our analysis reveals that data noise significantly impacts precision agriculture, leading to biased decisions and resource wastage. Data fog, resulting from heterogeneous data sources and weak inter-source correlations, complicates decision-making processes. Additionally, data islands hinder data sharing and integration, exacerbated by uneven data development across regions. Systematic implementation of standardized quality control protocols is essential for enhancing smart agricultural systems and ensuring sustainable development. This study offers a novel perspective on enhancing data quality in AIGC-driven smart agriculture by integrating the Juran quality improvement model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.