ArticleJAC-antimicrobial resistance2025
Parents' perspectives on childhood antibiotic treatment in Ireland-a qualitative study.
Article in JAC-antimicrobial resistance, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objectives: Paediatric respiratory tract infections can be a common reason for antibiotic prescribing in primary healthcare. Despite stewardship efforts, prescribing patterns often diverge from evidence-based guidelines. There are limited explorations of how parental beliefs and behaviours shape clinical decision-making. This qualitative study explored parental perspectives on antibiotic treatment-seeking behaviour in Ireland. Methods: We carried out semi-structured interviews with 20 parents who had children under 8 years old in Ireland. The interviews were guided by the COM-B (Capability, Opportunity, Motivation - Behaviour) model. The interview data was analysed inductively, using reflexive thematic analysis. Following this, relevant themes and subthemes were mapped to the domains of the COM-B. Results: The study identified three key themes: (i) experiencing perceived knowledge gaps in antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and antibiotic use captured how participants described negotiating AMR as a personal health risk while also experiencing AMR as a distant policy; (ii) navigating professional gatekeepers described the role of consulting with the general practitioner (GP), the out-of-hours doctor paradox, trusting the pharmacist and seeing receptionists as hidden gatekeepers who all shaped access to care; and (iii) deciding when to act reflected how people sought pragmatic reassurance and managed illness escalation anxiety in making decisions about seeking treatment. Conclusions: The study underscores the need for socio-culturally tailored antimicrobial resistance messaging and interventions that address both parental concerns and systemic barriers. By centring parental voices, this research highlights opportunities to strengthen antimicrobial stewardship through improved communication, recognition and expanded roles for the primary healthcare team.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.