Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41064182›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in psychology2025

Measuring intercultural competence-A review and introduction of the Cult Euro 1 test for intercultural competence.

Petia Genkova, Henrik Schreiber

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Petia GenkovaFaculty of Business and Social Sciences, Osnabrück - University of Applied Sciences, Osnabrück, Germany.
Henrik SchreiberFaculty of Business and Social Sciences, Osnabrück - University of Applied Sciences, Osnabrück, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intercultural Competence is a key factor in ensuring successful interaction between individuals from different cultural backgrounds, particularly in increasingly diverse and globalized societies. Despite its relevance, there is still no consensus on its definition, modeling, or measurement, especially from a psychological perspective. This paper provides a comprehensive review of the theoretical foundations of intercultural competence, including anthropological and psychological definitions of culture, interculturality, and competence. Central psychological models, such as the identity, learning theory, and stress approaches, are introduced as frameworks for understanding the development of intercultural competence. In addition, the paper analyses the conceptual distinctions between competence, personality, and intelligence and discusses their implications for the empirical assessment of intercultural competence. Various existing models and measurement instruments are evaluated in terms of validity, reliability, and cross-cultural applicability. Building on these insights, the paper presents Cult-Euro-1, the first standardized, psychometrically validated test designed to assess both general and German culture-specific intercultural competence. This modular, multi-methodological instrument addresses key conceptual and methodological gaps in the field. The test's practical applications in human resources, education, and social integration are discussed, with an emphasis on its potential to foster intercultural understanding, reduce discrimination, and enhance the participation of migrants in German society.

Indexed as

cultural intelligenceintercultural competencemeasurement validitypsychological assessmentsituational judgment test

Identifiers

PMID41064182
PMCPMC12500727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.