ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
Differential benefits of internet-based behavioral activation (iBA) for adolescents with high vs. low reward probability: a secondary analysis.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Behavioral activation (BA) therapy is effective in treating depression in both adults and adolescents, and internet-based BA (iBA) therapy showed promise during the COVID-19 pandemic. Adolescents with depression often exhibit motivational impairment, which is associated with reduced motivation and engagement in rewarding activities as well as a heightened risk of problematic internet use. This study examined the differential benefits of iBA in alleviating depressive symptoms in adolescents with relatively high and low Reward Probability Index (RPI) levels. Methods: Using a randomized controlled trial design, this secondary analysis included 38 adolescents diagnosed with major depressive disorder, who were randomly assigned to either the iBA or internet-based psychoeducation and supportive therapy (iST) groups. Depressive symptoms, BA levels, and RPI were assessed at pre-treatment, post-treatment, and the 3-month follow-up. Results: The findings revealed that adolescents with low baseline RPI who received iBA showed a significantly greater reduction in depressive symptoms than those with high baseline RPI. Additionally, adolescents with low baseline RPI in the iBA group showed a significantly greater reduction in depressive symptoms than those in the iST group. Discussion: These results suggest that iBA is particularly beneficial for adolescents with low RPI, especially those experiencing anhedonia, and provides a promising approach to enhance treatment outcomes in this population. High accessibility of iBA may promote engagement in rewarding real-life activities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.