ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Identifying clinically relevant findings in breast cancer using deep learning and feature attribution on local views from high-resolution mammography.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Explainable Artificial Intelligence in Mammography: A Systematic Review of Methods, Evaluation Practices, and Clinical Readiness.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Early detection of breast cancer via mammography screening is essential to improve survival outcomes, particularly in low-resource settings such as the global south where diagnostic accessibility remains limited. Although Deep Neural Network (DNN) models have demonstrated high accuracy in breast cancer detection, their clinical adoption is impeded by a lack of interpretability. Methods: To address this challenge, CorRELAX is proposed as an interpretable algorithm designed to quantify the relevance of localized regions within high-resolution mammographic images. CorRELAX evaluates the contribution of partial local information to the model's global decision-making and computes correlations between intermediate feature representations and predictions to produce global heatmaps for lesion localization. The framework utilizes a DNN trained on multi-scale crops of annotated lesions to effectively capture a spectrum of lesion sizes. Results: Evaluation on the VinDr-Mammo dataset yielded F1 Scores of 0.8432 for calcifications and 0.7392 for masses. Heatmap localization accuracy was assessed using the Pointing Game metric, with CorRELAX achieving average accuracies of 0.6358 based on model predictions and 0.5602 using the correlation maps, indicating robust lesion localization capabilities. Discussion: These results demonstrate that CorRELAX generates interpretable coarse-segmentation maps that enhance automated lesion detection in mammography. The improved interpretability facilitates clinically reliable decision-making and addresses a critical barrier toward the integration of AI-based methods in breast cancer screening workflows.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.