ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
A novel missense mutation c.1381T>C: p.(S461P) in
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Accurately determining the pathogenicity of newly discovered Methods: In one patient with endometrial carcinoma, next-generation sequencing (NGS) was performed to detect variants in POLE, TP53, BRCA1/2, CTNNB1, EPCAM, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2, as well as microsatellite instability (MSI) status in the tumor tissues. Variant interpretation followed ACMG/AMP guidelines, integrating evidence from literature, established guidelines, public databases, and clinical studies. Immunohistochemistry was used to evaluate MLH1, PMS2, MSH2, MSH6, and p53 protein expression in tumor tissues. Results: We successfully identified a novel potential missense mutation, c.1381T>C: p.(S461P), in exon 14 of POLE. This variant, reported here for the first time in endometrial carcinoma, was preliminarily classified as likely pathogenic based on available evidence. Additional variants were detected: TP53: c.844C>T: p.(R282W), TP53: c.711G>A: p.(M237I), and MSH6: c.3103C>T: p.(R1035*). The MSI status was classified as MSI-L. Immunohistochemistry revealed MLH1 (+), PMS2 (+), MSH2 (+), MSH6 (-), and p53 expression consistent with a mixed pattern (80% tumor region wild type, 20% region mutant subtype). Conclusion: This is the first report of the POLE (c.1381T>C: p.(S461P)) variant in endometrial carcinoma. We analyzed its potential pathogenic mechanism, which may contribute to the complex molecular phenotype of POLEmut + MMRd + p53abn tumors, and expanded the
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.