Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41064061›Full record

ArticleBrazilian journal of veterinary medicine2025

Characterization of cases and analysis of First-instance Judgments in Ethical Proceedings at the Regional Council of Veterinary Medicine of the State of São Paulo.

Roberta Tognareli Ruiz, Rosemary Viola Bosch, Suely Stringari, Jorge Luis Maria Ruiz, Paulo Cezar Maiorka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brazilian journal of veterinary medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Roberta Tognareli RuizPrograma de Pós-graduação em Patologia Experimental e Comparada. Universidade de São Paulo. SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4471-9362
Rosemary Viola BoschPrograma de Pós-graduação em Patologia Experimental e Comparada. Universidade de São Paulo. SP, Brazil.
Suely StringariPrograma de Pós-graduação em Patologia Experimental e Comparada. Universidade de São Paulo. SP, Brazil.
Jorge Luis Maria RuizLaboratório de Biotecnologia Aplica à Saúde. Universidade Federal da Integração Latino-Americana -UNILA, Foz do Iguaçú, PR, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7131-2162
Paulo Cezar MaiorkaPrograma de Pós-graduação em Patologia Experimental e Comparada. Universidade de São Paulo. SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4994-0082

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In Brazil, veterinary medicine is regulated by a resolution that sets out the Code of Ethics of the Veterinary Medical Profession, established by the Federal Council, which has national jurisdiction and compliance with which is monitored by the regional councils in each state. Some regional councils have reported an increase in the number of complaints of unethical proceedings in recent years, although this trend is not uniform across all Brazilian states. This increase has not yet been consistently documented. In this paper, a quantitative and qualitative description of cases of ethical infractions reported to the Regional Council of Veterinary Medicine of the State of São Paulo-the largest in Brazil, with approximately 59,324 (29%) registered veterinary doctors-is presented, covering the period from 2021 to 2023. Thus, a retrospective study was carried out to determine the profile of the reported professionals, the main motivations for the ethics-based complaints, and to characterize the case law of the cases judged in the first instance at the Regional Council of Veterinary Medicine of the State of São Paulo (CRMV-SP). The data analyzed shows that half of the complaints in the period were considered unfounded, and 123 complaints resulted in different types of conviction. The main article violated in the analyzed cases is Article 9 of the Code of Ethics for Veterinarians, which addresses ethical responsibility in the provision of professional services. This study demonstrates the need for veterinarians to become better acquainted with the ethical standards of the profession.

Indexed as

case lawCRMV-SPEthical codeEthical process

Identifiers

PMID41064061
PMCPMC12503135

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.