In one paragraphArticle in Scientifica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registryThe trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literatureWho cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
4 · The recordCorrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what moneyAuthors and funding
15 authors.
Nami LestariResearch Center for Agroindustry, Research Organization for Agriculture and Food, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Tangerang Selatan, Banten, Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0451-2049 Lukman JunaidiResearch Center for Agroindustry, Research Organization for Agriculture and Food, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Tangerang Selatan, Banten, Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5880-3282 Armen ZulhamResearch Center for Cooperative, Corporation, and Peoples Economy, Research Organization for Governance, Economy, and Community Welfare, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Jakarta, Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3763-1597 Abdullah Bin ArifResearch Center for Agroindustry, Research Organization for Agriculture and Food, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Tangerang Selatan, Banten, Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3552-2875 Tri Heru PrihadiResearch Center for Fishery, Research Organization for Earth Sciences and Maritime, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Cibinong, West Java, Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0599-6145 Mulyana HadipernataResearch Center for Agroindustry, Research Organization for Agriculture and Food, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Tangerang Selatan, Banten, Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4191-5920 Irin Iriana KusminiResearch Center for Applied Zoology, Research Organization for Life Sciences and Environment, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Cibinong, West Java, Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6829-4928 ErmiatiResearch Center for Cooperative, Corporation, and Peoples Economy, Research Organization for Governance, Economy, and Community Welfare, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Jakarta, Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8441-4176 Eddy Sapto HartantoResearch Center for Agroindustry, Research Organization for Agriculture and Food, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Tangerang Selatan, Banten, Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5867-0934 Bedy SudjarmokoResearch Center for Cooperative, Corporation, and Peoples Economy, Research Organization for Governance, Economy, and Community Welfare, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Jakarta, Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-2363-3388 Angela Mariana LusiastutiResearch Center for Veterinary Science, Research Organization for Health-National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Cibinong, West Java, Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2980-4224 MulyasariResearch Center for Marine and Land Bioindustry, Research Organization for Earth Sciences and Maritime, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), North Lombok, West Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4257-9738 Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
6 · The paper itselfAbstract
The high demand for Pangasius fillets in Indonesia has resulted in substantial byproduct waste, contributing to environmental concerns. To overcome this problem, it is necessary to utilize waste to create economically viable products, such as Pangasius fish byproduct oil. This study aimed to evaluate the quality of crude Pangasius oil extracted from fillet processing byproducts (belly and trimming) using dry and wet rendering techniques and to assess its business potential with a value-added approach using the Hayami method. The oil extraction methods used include dry and wet rendering. The study examined two main treatment categories: extraction method (A), which included dry rendering (A1) and wet rendering (A2), and the types of Pangasius fillet industry byproducts (B), which comprised trimming (B1) and belly (B2). The best oil, extracted from the belly via dry rendering, showed favorable physicochemical properties: free fatty acids (0.88%), peroxide value (5.85 mEq/100 g), iodine value (65.55 g I
Indexed as
belly fishdry renderingpangasius fish fillettrimming meatwet rendering
Identifiers
PMID41064059
PMCPMC12503960
What OpenQuestion holds
Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390