Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41064042›Full record

ArticleJournal of patient-centered research and reviews2025

Understanding the Burden of Myocardial Infarction and Patient Preferences for Treatment: A Real-World Study Assessing Patients' Perspectives via an Online Survey.

M Cecilia Bahit, Serge Korjian, Gerald Chi, Yazan Daaboul, Alberto Castro Molina, Ginger Jiang, Christiana Dangas, Mudit Tandon, Deepak L Bhatt, Roxana Mehran and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of patient-centered research and reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

M Cecilia BahitINECO Neurociencias, Rosario, Argentina.
Serge KorjianBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Gerald ChiBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Yazan DaaboulBaim Institute for Clinical Research, Boston, MA.
Alberto Castro MolinaBaim Institute for Clinical Research, Boston, MA.
Ginger JiangBaim Institute for Clinical Research, Boston, MA.
Christiana DangasBaim Institute for Clinical Research, Boston, MA.
Mudit TandonCarney Hospital, Dorchester, MA.
Deepak L BhattMount Sinai Fuster Heart Hospital, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY.
Roxana MehranMount Sinai Fuster Heart Hospital, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY.
Harriette G C van SpallBaim Institute for Clinical Research, Boston, MA.
Paul NaraCSL Behring, King of Prussia, PA.
Alka ShaunikCSL Behring, King of Prussia, PA.
Charles Michael GibsonBaim Institute for Clinical Research, Boston, MA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Myocardial infarction (MI) remains to be associated with a high risk of recurrent cardiovascular events and disease burden. This study assessed patient perspectives on the burden of disease and treatment in the first year post-MI. Methods: Data were collected via a self-administered online questionnaire posted on the Carenity patient platform in the United States (10/30/2022-12/30/2022). Only patients who had an MI in the prior year were eligible for inclusion. Results: A total of 151 patients completed the survey. The majority were men (69%), median age was 50 years, and 38% had an MI within the previous 90 days. Overall, post-MI complications were reported in 44% of the patients, including depression (23%), recurrent MI (7%), and stroke (7%). Follow-up care was provided by general/clinical cardiologists (67%), interventional cardiologists (38%), and general healthcare providers (59%). Most patients (80%) reported involvement in treatment decisions. The number of prescribed medications was considered the main contributor to post-MI treatment burden; approximately 42% of the patients found it tedious remembering to take their medications. The most commonly quoted post-MI treatment goal was recurrent MI risk reduction. Additionally, 73% of the patients considered improving quality of life to be a key goal. Overall, the patients' emotional well-being, physical well-being, and personal life were particularly impacted by MI. "Stress/anxiety/fear" was the most frequently reported emotion immediately post-MI, and one-third conveyed MI's negative impact on their employment status. MI impacted household finances in 74% of patients, with 38% losing income. Conclusions: MI places a substantial burden on patients. Understanding patient experiences post-MI may enhance patient-centered care.

Indexed as

impact on patientsmyocardial infarctionquality improvement effortsquality of life

Identifiers

PMID41064042
PMCPMC12503769

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.