ArticleTherapeutic advances in hematology2025
Observational retrospective study of the treatment of Waldenström's macroglobulinemia with ibrutinib in routine clinical practice in Spain.
Article in Therapeutic advances in hematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Waldenström's macroglobulinemia (WM) is a B-cell neoplasia characterized by the infiltration of lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma cells in the bone marrow and abnormal secretion of IgM paraprotein. Ibrutinib, a Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTKi), showed high efficacy in WM clinical trials. However, there is limited real-world data regarding its effectiveness and safety in routine clinical practice. Objectives: The MACRO study aimed to investigate the clinical, genetic, and demographic characteristics of WM patients treated with ibrutinib-based therapies in Spain. Key secondary objectives included describing effectiveness and safety profile. Design: Retrospective observational. Methods: This multicenter, observational, retrospective study included adult patients diagnosed with symptomatic WM treated with ibrutinib since its commercial approval in Spain in 2016. Data were collected from 19 hospitals through retrospective medical chart reviews. Results: Fifty-two eligible patients were recruited. The median age at the start of ibrutinib treatment was 74 years. Most of patients were male (65.4%) and had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1 (89.7%). Overall response rate was 92.2%, with a major response rate of 80.5%. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 57.2 months, and the estimated 2-year overall survival rate was 89.2%. No significant differences in PFS were identified based on the parameters defining risk subgroups, nor did they vary according to treatment line, initial dose, or treatment schedule. Most common adverse events included bleeding (30.8%), diarrhea (23.1%), and infections (15.4%), with most of them being grades 1-2. No new safety signs were identified. Conclusion: This study presents real-world evidence on the characteristics and outcomes of WM patients treated with ibrutinib in Spain, showing it to be effective with a manageable safety profile consistent with clinical trial results. These findings support ibrutinib as a valuable treatment option for WM in real-world settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.