SynthesisFrontiers in reproductive health2025
Effects of
Synthesis in Frontiers in reproductive health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Methods: A database search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, and PsychInfo to select relevant studies. Forty-four studies involving 858,966 participants were included in the systematic review. The results of these studies were very heterogeneous and yielded contradictory findings. Two meta-analyses, comprising a total of seven studies, were conducted. The first calculated the standardized mean difference of symptoms of depression between women who became pregnant through IVF and those who conceived spontaneously. In the second, we compared symptoms of anxiety between these two groups. Results: Five studies examined depressive symptoms and showed no significant difference between the two groups: Discussion: The results suggest that the psychological effects of IVF/ICSI, especially with respect to anxiety, require attention and support from healthcare providers, although the effect size is small. Further studies with adequate sample sizes, including women with both successful and unsuccessful treatment, and adequately controlling for important confounders are needed to fully understand the effects of IVF/ICSI on mental health. Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO (CRD42023461472).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.