Trial reportFrontiers in immunology2025
Effects of sex but not race and geographic origin on vaccine-induced HIV-specific antibody responses.
Trial report in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Sex, race and geographic location may affect vaccine-induced immune responses, yet few preventive HIV vaccine trials have systematically evaluated such effects. The main objective of this study was therefore to examine the role of these factors on vaccine-induced HIV-specific immune responses within the HVTN 204 trial. This randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial enrolled 480 Black and Caucasian adults from Africa and the Americas, who received a trivalent DNA-HIV-1 vaccine prime followed by a rAd5 vector HIV-1 vaccine boost. Methods: Available serum samples from baseline and four weeks after the final vaccination boost from Black (n=85, 59% female) and Caucasian (n=49, 51% female) HVTN 204 vaccine recipients from South Africa and the United States of America were studied using an Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay to determine titers of Envelope-specific IgG1, IgG3 and IgA antibodies. Recognition of linear Envelope peptide-specific IgG responses was mapped in a randomly selected subgroup analysis using a custom-designed peptide microarray (n = 41, 49% female). Associations between vaccine-induced Envelope-specific antibody responses and sex assigned at birth (female or male), race and geographic location were then analyzed by the Mann-Whitney U test, Fisher's exact test and multivariate logistic regression. Results: Four weeks post-final vaccination boost, we observed that Envelope-specific antibody titers were significantly increased for IgG1 but reduced for IgA in females (female vs. male median titer: 900 vs. 300, p=0.030 and <100 vs. 100, p=0.007, respectively). Multivariate logistic regression confirmed that female sex increased the odds for higher Envelope-specific IgG1 and low IgA titers compared to males. In terms of antibody epitopes, the V2 region was more frequently recognized in females than males (p=0.008). Race and geographic location had no apparent influence on antibody isotype titers investigated. Conclusion: Female sex was associated with higher vaccine-induced IgG Envelope-specific binding antibody titers and recognition of V2 region of HIV Envelope in HVTN 204 volunteers. No such associations were detected for race or geographic location. Understanding biological factors driving these sex-based differences may improve the design of a new generation of HIV vaccine candidates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.