Trial reportBrain communications2025
Autologous bone marrow mononuclear cell administration for neurological sequelae after traumatic brain injury: a matched control study.
Trial report in Brain communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Stem Cells in Post-Stroke Regenerative Therapy: Current Role of Wharton's Jelly Mesenchymal Stem Cells in the Orchestrum.Brain sciences · 2026Review
- The Potential and Prospects of Hydrogel Applications in Traumatic Brain Injury Treatment.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neurological sequelae after traumatic brain injury impair motor and behavioural functions, imposing a heavy burden on patients and society. Traditional treatments show limited efficacy, highlighting the need for advanced therapies. This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of intrathecal administration of bone marrow mononuclear cells for treating these sequelae. A matched control clinical trial was conducted on 50 patients. The intervention group received two intrathecal infusions of bone marrow mononuclear cells, 6 months apart, combined with rehabilitation therapy, while the control group received rehabilitation therapy only. Safety was assessed through adverse events and serious adverse events. Effectiveness was measured via the Functional Independence Measure, Short Form-36 Quality of Life Questionnaire and Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended. MRI and PET-CT imaging monitored brain changes in the intervention group. No serious adverse events were reported during 12 months of follow-up. Mild adverse events, such as pain at the aspiration site and dizziness, were self-limiting. The intervention group showed significant improvements in motor scores (+4.3 points;
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.