ReviewFrontiers in cell and developmental biology2025
Restoration of skeletal muscle function via mesenchymal stem cells: mechanistic insights and therapeutic advances in myasthenia gravis.
Review in Frontiers in cell and developmental biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Myogenic differentiation-derived small extracellular vesicles as a therapeutic strategy for miR-193b-3p-mediated muscle regeneration.Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2026Article
- Current evidence and emerging therapeutic strategies for non-exercise interventions in sarcopenia associated with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a narrative review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Review
- Wenyang Yishen Tongluo prescription synergizes with bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells to alleviate rheumatoid arthritis via inhibiting IL-6.Journal of molecular histology · 2026Article
- Efficacy of neonatal mouse muscle extracellular vesicles in skeletal muscle repair and regeneration.Cell regeneration (London, England) · 2026Article
- Musculoskeletal ultrasound-guided cellular therapy: Current applications and future directions in skeletal muscle regeneration.Iranian journal of basic medical sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have demonstrated distinct advantages in skeletal muscle repair owing to their self-renewal capacity, multidirectional differentiation potential, and immunomodulatory functions. As a critical regulator of skeletal muscle regeneration, MSCs have been shown to ameliorate skeletal muscle injury induced by factors such as wasting and metabolic disorders through the activation of satellite cell function, inhibition of myofiber atrophy, and regulation of protein metabolic balance. In the treatment of myasthenia gravis (MG), the therapeutic effects of MSCs are exerted through dual mechanisms: first, autoantibody production is reduced via immunomodulation, thereby alleviating immune-mediated attacks at neuromuscular junctions; second, secondary muscle atrophy is delayed by preserving the integrity of neuromuscular signaling. Notably, MSC function is closely associated with acetylcholine metabolism, neuromuscular junction stability, and the aging microenvironment, in which aging-induced MSC decline may exacerbate intramuscular fat infiltration and impair regenerative capacity. In this paper, the biological properties of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and their regulatory roles in skeletal muscle metabolic and injury-related abnormalities are systematically reviewed, and the fundamental significance of MSCs in skeletal muscle repair and myasthenia gravis (MG) therapy is elucidated through multiple mechanisms, including immunomodulation, neuroprotection, and muscle fiber regeneration. Furthermore, the bottlenecks of clinical translation (including cell source selection, phenotypic stability, and efficacy heterogeneity) are analyzed, and the challenges and optimization strategies for clinical application are discussed, with the aim of providing theoretical references for regenerative medicine research in neuromuscular diseases. However, clinical translation studies have indicated that the actual efficacy of most MSC-based therapies is considerably lower than that observed in
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.