Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41063958›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2025

Digital health literacy among older adults in China: a cross-sectional study on prevalence and influencing factors.

Xingxia Zhang, Yongqing Yuan, Jie Jiang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xingxia ZhangWest China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Yongqing YuanWest China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Jie JiangWest China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The rapid integration of digital technologies into healthcare has emphasised the importance of digital health literacy (DHL) in enhancing health outcomes. Despite the increasing adoption of the internet among older adults in China, disparities in eHealth literacy persist, necessitating urgent investigation. Objective: This study aimed to investigate the status and predictors of DHL among older adults in Sichuan Province, China. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted from October to December 2024 using a multistage stratified sampling method. Data were collected using the Chinese version of the eHEALS questionnaire. Univariate and multivariable binary logistic regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of DHL, adjusting for sociodemographic, health-related, and internet use variables. Results: A total of 1,202 valid responses from adults aged 60 years and over were analysed. Only 30.45% ( Conclusion: This study reveals suboptimal digital health literacy among older adults in China, driven by rural-urban disparities, gender gaps and limited digital engagement. In future, interventions tailored to specific needs, such as community-based training, telemedicine promotion and family-supported digital education, will be critical in bridging this gap.

Indexed as

Digital TechnologyHealth LiteracyTelemedicineAgedAged, 80 and overChinaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceSurveys and QuestionnairesChinadigital dividedigital health literacye-health literacyinternetolder adults

Identifiers

PMID41063958
PMCPMC12500426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.