Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41063953›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2025

A blockchain framework using proof of authority and smart contracts for ethical and secure healthcare asset management.

Muhammad Farooq Shaikh, Syed Hamza Hassan, Alessia Maccaro, Giacomo Pratesi, Davide Piaggio

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Muhammad Farooq ShaikhSchool of Engineering, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.
Syed Hamza HassanDepartment of Computer Science, National University of Computer and Emerging Sciences, Karachi, Punjab, Pakistan.
Alessia MaccaroDepartment of Social Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Napoli, Italy.
Giacomo PratesiPaperbox Health S.R.L, Turin, Italy.
Davide PiaggioSchool of Engineering, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The proposed model in this paper focuses on asset tracking and monitoring in the healthcare industry and it uses blockchain technology. Data security incidents in the healthcare field have created financial and ethical problems over the last few years. During 2024, the money lost from healthcare data breaches often exceeded $4.88 million due to the exposure of private patients and asset information. This shows why it is important to use secure systems to protect worthwhile information and manage key assets efficiently and correctly. Since such intrusions cannot be prevented by the current systems, businesses end up losing money and working less efficiently. These issues are addressed by using a system that includes blockchain, IoT and digital asset tracking technologies. To ensure data integrity and prevent fake information, Proof of Authority (PoA) uses chosen, recognized authorities to verify and confirm each transaction. To protect transactions, PoA requires a number of approvals from different parties which helps ensure that transactions are safe and secure. With immutable and decentralized features, blockchain makes the management of assets more secure and transparent. Records of asset transfers and data are safely stored on the blockchain with smart contracts, providing real-time monitoring and no room for errors. When integrated with IoT devices, the system can constantly check all the assets, improving the company's efficiency while reducing losses of items. The findings suggest that a PoA blockchain system can help healthcare asset management systems operate more ethically, safely, transparently, and efficiently.

Indexed as

BlockchainComputer SecurityContractsHumansassetblockchainhealthcaremanagementmonitoringtracking

Identifiers

PMID41063953
PMCPMC12500698

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.