ArticleTransboundary and emerging diseases2025
Predictive Modeling of Global SARS-CoV-2 Infection Risk in Animals: Unveiling Potential Reservoirs and Informing Health Policy Synergies.
Article in Transboundary and emerging diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reports of SARS-CoV-2 infections in animals have increasingly raised concerns about potential natural reservoirs for the virus. However, our understanding of the global distribution and drivers of animal infection risk remains limited. To bridge this knowledge gap, we conducted extensive data mining from various sources and developed machine learning (ML) models to estimate the global probability of SARS-CoV-2 infections in animals. We trained and evaluated three ML models, mapping the distribution of infection risk in well-documented regions and projecting risk in areas with sparse infection records. Our models pinpointed high-risk areas in Europe and the United States, where infection records are scattered, as well as in the southern regions of Brazil and Asia, which have sparse infection records. Notably, our projections indicated overlaps between predicted high-risk areas and the known distribution of white-tailed deer, American minks, and Asian small-clawed otters. Anthropogenic factors were found to be more predictive of animal infection than biophysical factors, highlighting the importance of accessibility, population density, and COVID-19 mortality rates. These findings suggest the potential for synergies between public and animal health policies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.