Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41063922›Full record

ArticleTransboundary and emerging diseases2025

Predictive Modeling of Global SARS-CoV-2 Infection Risk in Animals: Unveiling Potential Reservoirs and Informing Health Policy Synergies.

Ruying Fang, Luqi Wang, Xin Yang, Yiyang Guo, Bingjie Peng, Yinsheng Zhang, Dilinuer Kamili, Sirui Li, Yunting Lyv, Sen Li and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transboundary and emerging diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Ruying FangInstitute of Artificial Intelligence, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0163-8340
Luqi WangSchool of Environmental Science and Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Xin YangSchool of Environmental Science and Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Yiyang GuoSchool of Environmental Science and Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Bingjie PengSchool of Environmental Science and Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Yinsheng ZhangInstitute of Artificial Intelligence, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Dilinuer KamiliSchool of Environmental Science and Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Sirui LiDepartment of Environment Science and Engineering, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Yunting LyvDepartment of Environment Science and Engineering, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Sen LiSchool of Environmental Science and Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1177-7339
Shunqing XuKey Laboratory of Environment and Health, Ministry of Education, School of Public Health, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7771-3821

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reports of SARS-CoV-2 infections in animals have increasingly raised concerns about potential natural reservoirs for the virus. However, our understanding of the global distribution and drivers of animal infection risk remains limited. To bridge this knowledge gap, we conducted extensive data mining from various sources and developed machine learning (ML) models to estimate the global probability of SARS-CoV-2 infections in animals. We trained and evaluated three ML models, mapping the distribution of infection risk in well-documented regions and projecting risk in areas with sparse infection records. Our models pinpointed high-risk areas in Europe and the United States, where infection records are scattered, as well as in the southern regions of Brazil and Asia, which have sparse infection records. Notably, our projections indicated overlaps between predicted high-risk areas and the known distribution of white-tailed deer, American minks, and Asian small-clawed otters. Anthropogenic factors were found to be more predictive of animal infection than biophysical factors, highlighting the importance of accessibility, population density, and COVID-19 mortality rates. These findings suggest the potential for synergies between public and animal health policies.

Indexed as

COVID-19Disease ReservoirsHealth PolicySARS-CoV-2AnimalsGlobal HealthHumansMachine Learninganimal infectiondistributionmachine learningmappingSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID41063922
PMCPMC12503988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.