Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41063909›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Vascular Injury Patterns in High-Energy Trauma: A Systematic Review of Incidence, Diagnostic Modalities, and Management Strategies.

Muhammad Zain Ul Abidin, Murhaf Assaf, Ahmed A Ali, Shenouda Shehata Abdelmesih, Mohammed M Alsharif, Moazer Ibrahim Hamid Mohammed, Abdelrahman Ibrahim, Aliaa H Alkhazendar, Faiqa Ijaz, Manahil Awan and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Muhammad Zain Ul AbidinTrauma and Orthopaedics, Luton and Dunstable University Hospital, Luton, GBR.
Murhaf AssafGeneral Surgery, Princess of Wales Hospital, Cwm Taf Morgannwg University Health Board, Bridgend, GBR.
Ahmed A AliEmergency, Mubarak Al-Kabeer Hospital, Jabriya, KWT.
Shenouda Shehata AbdelmesihOrthopaedics and Traumatology, Royal Gwent Hospital, Newport, GBR.
Mohammed M AlsharifGeneral Surgery, Al-Ahli Hospital, Hebron, PSE.
Moazer Ibrahim Hamid MohammedSurgery, BUPA (British United Provident Association) Arabia, Jeddah, SAU.
Abdelrahman IbrahimTrauma and Orthopaedics, University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust, Stoke-on-Trent, GBR.
Aliaa H AlkhazendarSurgery, The Islamic University of Gaza, Gaza, PSE.
Faiqa IjazMedicine, Fatima Jinnah Medical University, Lahore, PAK.
Manahil AwanExecutive and Special Ward, Liaquat National Hospital, Karachi, PAK.
Ahmed KhanMedicine, Elizabethtown College, Islamabad, PAK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vascular injuries in high-energy trauma are life- and limb-threatening emergencies, requiring prompt diagnosis and intervention. This systematic review included five studies published between 2019 and 2023, comprising approximately 480 patients. A literature search of PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library was conducted using keywords such as "vascular injury," "high-energy trauma," "CT angiography," and "endovascular repair." Most studies focused on extremity injuries, particularly involving the femoral, popliteal, iliac, and brachial arteries. CT angiography (CTA) consistently demonstrated superior diagnostic accuracy compared to Doppler ultrasonography or clinical examination. Endovascular techniques, such as stenting and embolization, were compared with open surgical repair. Outcomes assessed included amputation rates, limb salvage, mortality, and hospital stay. Endovascular methods showed potential benefits in reducing complications and hospital duration in selected patients. Common pathophysiological patterns included arterial disruption, thrombosis, and ischemia-reperfusion injury. However, none of the studies evaluated renal outcomes. The included studies were assessed for risk of bias using ROBINS-I (Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions) and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS), revealing moderate quality overall. These findings highlight the diagnostic value of CTA and suggest a growing role for endovascular management in high-energy vascular trauma. Further high-quality studies are needed to guide treatment selection and optimize outcomes.

Indexed as

ct angiographyendovascular repairhigh energy traumaincidencelimb salvagevascular injury

Identifiers

PMID41063909
PMCPMC12501805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.