ReviewCureus2025
Vascular Injury Patterns in High-Energy Trauma: A Systematic Review of Incidence, Diagnostic Modalities, and Management Strategies.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Vascular injuries in high-energy trauma are life- and limb-threatening emergencies, requiring prompt diagnosis and intervention. This systematic review included five studies published between 2019 and 2023, comprising approximately 480 patients. A literature search of PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library was conducted using keywords such as "vascular injury," "high-energy trauma," "CT angiography," and "endovascular repair." Most studies focused on extremity injuries, particularly involving the femoral, popliteal, iliac, and brachial arteries. CT angiography (CTA) consistently demonstrated superior diagnostic accuracy compared to Doppler ultrasonography or clinical examination. Endovascular techniques, such as stenting and embolization, were compared with open surgical repair. Outcomes assessed included amputation rates, limb salvage, mortality, and hospital stay. Endovascular methods showed potential benefits in reducing complications and hospital duration in selected patients. Common pathophysiological patterns included arterial disruption, thrombosis, and ischemia-reperfusion injury. However, none of the studies evaluated renal outcomes. The included studies were assessed for risk of bias using ROBINS-I (Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions) and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS), revealing moderate quality overall. These findings highlight the diagnostic value of CTA and suggest a growing role for endovascular management in high-energy vascular trauma. Further high-quality studies are needed to guide treatment selection and optimize outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.