ArticleCureus2025
Beyond the Swelling: A Missed Foreign Body in the Testis.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intratesticular foreign bodies are rare. We present the case of a young man who, three months after experiencing scrotal trauma, was evaluated for a suspected intratesticular foreign body. The incident occurred during the use of a wire brush attached to a grinder, likely resulting in the penetration of a small metallic fragment into the scrotal wall and testicular tissue. Initial ultrasound imaging was inconclusive, and the patient was treated empirically with antibiotics. Although his symptoms resolved over time, ongoing concern led to multiple follow-up visits. A third ultrasound performed approximately 12 weeks post-injury revealed a linear, hyperechoic structure, raising suspicion for a retained foreign body and prompting surgical referral. Upon admission, the patient was asymptomatic, and physical examination revealed only a small, firm nodule in the left testis. Surgical exploration confirmed the presence of a thin metallic wire, which was removed without complications. This case illustrates the diagnostic difficulty of identifying retained intratesticular foreign bodies when early imaging is non-diagnostic and symptoms subside. It emphasizes the value of repeated high-resolution ultrasonography in cases with a suggestive clinical history.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.