ArticleEuropean heart journal. Imaging methods and practice2025
Point-of-care ultrasound vs. routine transthoracic echocardiography for screening of cardiovascular disease in pregnant women.
Article in European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Automated artificial intelligence-enabled measurement of cardiac structures on point-of-care ultrasonography: a prospective multicenter validation study.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: The Prospective Pakistan Registry of Echocardiographic Screening in Asymptomatic Pregnant Women (PRESAP) is a registry designed for the echocardiographic screening of structural heart disease (SHD). It offers a unique opportunity to compare the effectiveness of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) vs. routine transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) in this population. This sub-study of the PRESAP registry aimed to compare the detection of SHD in asymptomatic pregnant women using POCUS vs. routine TTE. Methods and results: Between February 2023 and March 2024, pregnant women without known heart disease were enrolled in the PRESAP registry. Participants underwent a limited echocardiogram, using either POCUS or TTE. The primary outcome was the detection of abnormal findings, including left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD), valvular heart disease (VHD), and congenital heart disease (CHD). Matching cohorts were created using propensity score matching, based on demographic factors, comorbid conditions, and gestational history. Among 18 401 patients, 9681 (52.6%) underwent POCUS. The 1:1 propensity-matched cohort included 4177 patients in each arm. Abnormal echocardiographic findings were detected in 4.4% (185) of the TTE group and 3% (124) of the POCUS group ( Conclusion: POCUS may be considered as an alternative to TTE for screening for SHD in asymptomatic pregnant women, particularly in resource-limited settings. TTE was superior for LVSD, and POCUS was equally effective in identifying valvular and congenital heart disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.