Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41063876›Full record

ArticleEuropean heart journal. Imaging methods and practice2025

Comparison of computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) alone vs. CTCA with selective FFR

Mohamed Kira, Lavinia Gabara, Mohamed Abouelasaad, Hussein Bashar, Ahmed Elserwey, Zoe Nicholas, Campbell Rogers, Sam Wilding, Pamela S Douglas, Mark Hlatky and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Mohamed KiraCoronary & Structural Heart Research Group, University Hospital Southampton NHS FT, Tremona Road, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-1299-1488
Lavinia GabaraCoronary & Structural Heart Research Group, University Hospital Southampton NHS FT, Tremona Road, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1729-3391
Mohamed AbouelasaadCoronary & Structural Heart Research Group, University Hospital Southampton NHS FT, Tremona Road, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK.
Hussein BasharCoronary & Structural Heart Research Group, University Hospital Southampton NHS FT, Tremona Road, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8256-5168
Ahmed ElserweyCoronary & Structural Heart Research Group, University Hospital Southampton NHS FT, Tremona Road, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8274-8981
Zoe NicholasCoronary & Structural Heart Research Group, University Hospital Southampton NHS FT, Tremona Road, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4674-3259
Campbell RogersHeartFlow, Inc., Mountain View, CA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3955-7650
Sam WildingClinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4184-2821
Pamela S DouglasDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Centre, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Mark HlatkyDepartment of Health Policy and Department of Medicine (Cardiovascular Medicine), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4686-9441
Nick CurzenCoronary & Structural Heart Research Group, University Hospital Southampton NHS FT, Tremona Road, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9651-7829

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims: The original FORECAST trial was designed to compare a strategy of computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) and selective FFR Methods and results: The FORECAST trial recruited 1400 patients randomized between two strategies: (i) initial test of choice at the discretion of the healthcare provider (standard care arm) or (ii) CTCA ± FFR Conclusion: In this prespecified FORECAST substudy of patients whose clinicians preferred CTCA as the first test prior to randomization, the CTCA ± FFR

Indexed as

coronary artery diseasecoronary computed tomography angiographyfractional flow reserve derived from computed tomographyhealthcare costmajor adverse cardiac events

Identifiers

PMID41063876
PMCPMC12502911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.