ArticleCase reports in oncology
Advanced Minimal Residual Disease Detection Using a Novel Circulating Tumor DNA Assay: A Report of Two Cases.
Article in Case reports in oncology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Tumor-informed minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring assays based on plasma circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) are increasingly integrated into the clinical management of patients with cancer. In the post-surgical curative intent setting and as an adjunct to radiographic imaging for response assessment and surveillance, timely identification of MRD may better guide therapeutic decision-making. The increasing clinical adoption of MRD testing, supported by a growing body of evidence demonstrating its potential utility at critical decision points across diverse tumor histology, has brought attention to the variability in the analytical performance of available ctDNA assays. This variability is becoming increasingly appreciated as a key factor influencing clinical performance. Case Presentations: Here we report a case series in breast and rectal cancer involving treatment monitoring with a novel advanced MRD assay, illustrating its ability to identify subclinical metastasis and disease resolution below the validated limit of detection of a commercially available ctDNA assay in these cases. Conclusion: Results aided medical decision-making and underscored the need for highly sensitive assays in MRD detection. The differences in sensitivity, driven primarily by analytical variables, highlight the importance of selecting an assay that is not only analytically robust but also appropriately matched to the patient's specific clinical context, to help ensure optimal utility and minimize the risk of misinterpretation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.