ArticleCase reports in oncology
Reirradiation for Sinonasal Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma in a Low-Middle Income Setting: A Case Report and Literature Review.
Article in Case reports in oncology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Reirradiation for recurrent adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) of the head and neck poses significant clinical challenges, particularly in low- and middle-income countries where access to advanced radiation modalities such as proton or carbon ion therapy is limited. Given the tumor's radioresistant nature and the risk of cumulative toxicity to critical structures, reporting experiences with accessible and precise photon-based techniques remains essential. This case highlights the potential of volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) as a feasible reirradiation option in such settings. Case Presentation: We report the case of a 79-year-old male with a history of left ethmoidal sinus ACC initially treated with surgery followed by cobalt-based radiotherapy. Eighteen years later, the patient presented with an inoperable local recurrence. A multidisciplinary tumor board recommended reirradiation using VMAT. A total dose of 60 Gy in 30 fractions was delivered, with careful dosimetric planning to respect cumulative tolerance thresholds of organs at risk (OAR). The treatment was well-tolerated, with no acute grade ≥3 toxicities. Post-treatment imaging showed a marked reduction in tumor volume, and the patient had no severe late toxicity during follow-up or distant metastasis. Conclusions: This case illustrates the potential role of VMAT as a viable reirradiation strategy for head and neck ACC, particularly in resource-limited settings. It emphasizes the importance of individualized treatment planning, accurate dose delivery, and multidisciplinary evaluation in achieving tumor control while minimizing toxicity. Such experiences contribute valuable insights into the management of complex recurrent tumors, where therapeutic options are limited.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.