ReviewACS catalysis2025
Toward Reliable and Reproducible Research in Organic Photocatalysis by Carbon Nitride.
Review in ACS catalysis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The rate of scientific publications has grown exponentially over the past few decades, but this has come at the expense of reproducibility. In this context, fields like organic photocatalysis and materials synthesis have also been affected. This Perspective aims at providing general guidelines to increase trustworthiness and favor reproducibility for those interdisciplinary researchers working on organic photocatalytic transformations catalyzed by carbon-nitride-based materials. Thus, the article focuses on the importance of accurately reporting and describing all the stages of experimental work, from the photocatalyst synthesis and characterization to the evaluation of the reaction conditions, control experiments, andmore generallyall the details that may ensure reproducibility. Additionally, we investigate and discuss the risks of falling into inadequate research practices, emphasizing that irreproducibility in science is a major problem that undermines the utility and credibility of scientific research. These aspects are crucial for the scientific community, and we emphasize the need to raise awareness and educate researchers toward best experimental practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.