SynthesisFrontiers in nephrology2025
Route-specific effects of desmopressin on bleeding and hyponatremia after kidney biopsy: meta-analysis of intranasal vs. intravenous administration.
Synthesis in Frontiers in nephrology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effect of Preprocedural Desmopressin on Complications after Kidney Biopsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Kidney360 · 2026Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence in membranous nephropathy: transforming clinical management toward precision medicine.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Hemorrhage represents the primary complication associated with kidney biopsy, with post-biopsy bleeding occurring in up to 14% of cases. Some clinicians routinely administer hemostatic agents, such as desmopressin, prior to kidney biopsy to mitigate the risk of significant bleeding. However, the efficacy of this practice remains contentious. Consequently, this meta-analysis was undertaken to assess existing studies regarding the efficacy and safety of desmopressin used before kidney biopsy. Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis incorporated both randomized controlled trials and observational studies that examined the outcomes of desmopressin administration prior to percutaneous renal biopsy. Efficacy was measured by the incidence of bleeding events, while safety was assessed through the rate of hyponatremia. A comprehensive search of multiple databases was performed, and the risk of bias was evaluated, and statistical analyses were conducted using appropriate models. Results: Twelve studies were included. The primary meta-analysis showed no significant reduction in overall bleeding risk with desmopressin (pooled OR 0.71, 95% CI: 0.47 - 1.09; I² = 79%; p = 0.12).Statistically significant differences were observed in the intranasal administration group (pooled OR 0.41;95% CI: 0.28 to 0.60; I Conclusion: Desmopressin did not significantly reduce overall bleeding risk after kidney biopsy. While intranasal administration, RCT only and low bias group showed efficacy in subgroup analyses, it carried a significant hyponatremia risk. Route-specific protocols warrant further study. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42023391915.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.