ReviewBreast care (Basel, Switzerland)2026
New Perspectives in the Management of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.
Review in Breast care (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Pyrone Glucoside fromBiomolecules · 2026Article
- Balancing global standards and regional nuances in breast cancer care: the role of guidelines, clinical research, precision medicine, and artificial intelligence in advancing quality of care for patients worldwide.Cancer biology & medicine · 2026Article
- Lysosomal-stress-driven cargo-fate switching between autophagic degradation and small extracellular vesicle release in triple-negative breast cancer: a hypothesis and theory article.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The biological heterogeneity of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and the availability of a growing number of therapeutic options necessitate continuous redefinition of the ideal treatment algorithm for patients with TNBC. Austrian experts convened for an advisory board meeting in November 2024 to discuss standards of care in the early and metastatic settings with a focus on the healthcare situation in Austria. Summary: This paper discusses biological principles, (neo)adjuvant treatment standards and strategies of escalation and de-escalation, as well as standards of care, new treatment options, and the management of central nervous system (CNS) disease in the setting of metastatic TNBC. Key Messages: TNBC remains a high-risk subtype of breast cancer. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is preferred in early-stage disease starting from cT1c, cN0, with the addition of pembrolizumab recommended from clinical stage II. Post-neoadjuvant treatment is guided by the pathological response and
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.