ArticleAnesthesiology research and practice2025
The Efficacy of Continuous Adductor Canal Block Oblique Approach to Postoperative Analgesia After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Controlled Clinical Trial.
Article in Anesthesiology research and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Continuous adductor canal block (CACB) is a highly effective analgesic technique in total knee arthroplasty. The brachy axis approach (BA) is currently the common method used for CACB. Although CACB for BA offers advantages such as easy localization and operation due to clear anatomy, it has limitations such as short catheter placement and a high dislocation rate. These limitations can result in insufficient postoperative analgesia and impact patient rehabilitation. The perineural catheters placed parallel for CACB increases the difficulty of operation and the risk of puncture injury. In this study, the authors first applied the oblique approach (OA) to CACB and systematically compared the postoperative analgesic effects and adverse reactions of these two CACB methods with different puncture angles. Methods: Ninety subjects who underwent TKA were randomly assigned to receive ultrasound-guided CACB using either the OA or BA. The main outcome measured was the exercise maximum visual analog scale (VAS) score at 72 h after surgery. The main safety indicator was the rate of catheter dislocation. The data were recorded and analyzed using analysis of variance, with adjustments made for baseline characteristics. Results: There was no statistical difference in catheter placement time or postoperative resting VAS between the two groups. However, the postoperative exercise VAS and the incidence of postoperative adverse effects were lower in the OA group compared to the BA group. Conclusions: The OA of CACB applied after TKA improved the analgesic effect during the postoperative motor state compared to the BA and reduced the incidence of adverse reactions, without increasing the catheterization procedure time. Trial Registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry: ChiCTR2200059889.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.