ArticleEarly intervention in psychiatry2025
Engagement, Disengagement and Re-Engagement in Mental Health Services Among Young Patients With First-Episode Psychosis: A Scoping Review.
Article in Early intervention in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The influence of clinical and sociodemographic variables on employment and education for Danish youth with a psychotic disorder: a population-based national registry study.Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology · 2026Article
- Religiosity and Engagement in Early Intervention Programme for First-Episode Psychosis.Early intervention in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Client Engagement With an Early Psychosis Program and Post-Program Health Service Use: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Early intervention in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Engagement, Disengagement and Re-Engagement in Mental Health Services Among Young Patients With First-Episode Psychosis: A Scoping Review.Early intervention in psychiatry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionEngagement in mental health services among young patients with first-episode psychosis (FEP) is crucial for preventing relapse. We conducted this scoping review to establish the proportion and determinants of engagement, disengagement and re-engagement in outpatient mental health care among young patients from 13 to 35 years with FEP.
methodsWe used the guidelines for scoping review by the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) and the Arksey and O'Malley framework. We searched for published and unpublished studies guided by the inclusion criteria: studies published in English from 1990, the expansion of psychiatric outpatient, focused on engaged, disengaged and re-engaged in outpatient mental health care using quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods studies. We performed the numerical and thematic analysis and reporting using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Extension for scoping review (PRISMA-ScR).
resultsAbout 25 articles published from 2002 to 2020 met the inclusion criteria for this review; the proportion of young people with FEP who remained engaged was 45.5% for 6 months of follow-up, and the proportion of re-engagement after initial disengagement was 78.8%. Disengagement ranged between 13% and 56.3% for 12-36 months. The socio-demographic factors associated with disengagement were older age, male, black, unmarried status, living alone, unemployment, social and material deprivation, poverty, substance use and involvement with criminal justice. Some clinical determinants included a history of mental illness in the family and a psychosis disorder diagnosis other than schizophrenia.
conclusionDisengagement from mental health services is consistently high among people with FEP, indicating the need for intervention studies that address the associated individual and clinical factors to ensure their retention in treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.