ArticleThe Journal of infectious diseases2026
A Framework for Assessing the Opportunity for Advanced Research, Development, and Regulatory Approval of Medical Countermeasures: A Component of BARDA's Emerging Infectious Diseases Strategy.
Article in The Journal of infectious diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Health and economic burdens of emerging infectious diseases in the USA, US territories and globally.BMJ global health · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe advanced research, development, and regulatory approval of medical countermeasures (MCMs) for emerging pathogens remains critical to national health security. We created a conceptual framework to assess the feasibility of generating pivotal data to support FDA regulatory approval of vaccines and therapeutics against known pathogens. Our framework is intended to guide key portfolio decisions on developing MCMs for emerging viral pathogens.
methodsThis framework draws on prior experience with MCM development programs, current FDA guidance, and insights from scientific, regulatory, and public health subject matter experts. We identified key requirements that impact the ability to generate pivotal data and assessed the likelihood of meeting these requirements based on current epidemiology, technical capabilities, and infrastructure. To demonstrate utility, we applied the framework to a subset of prioritized pathogens.
resultsWe identified eight factors central to assessing the feasibility of advanced development and FDA approval of vaccines and therapeutics. These factors were used to evaluate seven emerging pathogens to illustrate how the framework may inform investment decisions across disease contexts.
conclusionsThis framework supports more efficient resource allocation by highlighting MCM candidates with the highest potential for FDA approval within existing regulatory paradigms. Given current conditions, vaccine development appears more feasible than therapeutics for the pathogens assessed, although regulatory pathways remain product- and context-specific. Close consultation with the FDA will be critical in defining appropriate regulatory strategies. This framework offers a structured, proactive approach to advance MCM development and strengthen national preparedness against emerging pathogens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.