ReviewAnnals of botany2026
The current state of our knowledge of the domestication and evolution of the grain amaranths: a critical standpoint.
Review in Annals of botany, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transcriptome Profiling of Leaves and Roots from Rooibos (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Amaranth, the ancient pseudocereal: a promising crop for climate-resilient agriculture and healthy diets.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAmaranthaceae is a large family of angiosperms consisting of the former Amaranthaceae sensu stricto and the former Chenopodiaceae, distributed from the tropics to more temperate regions. Amaranths were independently domesticated in Asia and America. For seed production, three native American species, referred to as grain amaranths, resulted from human artificial selection and cultivation over thousands of years: Amaranthus caudatus, A. cruentus and A. hypochondriacus. SCOPE: This review attempts to provide a survey of the research in amaranths since Sauer (1918-2008). In addition, we try to clarify confusion in the literature by posing the following questions. (1) Were Sauer's proposals corroborated by recent research? (2) Is there consensus on an ancestor of the grain amaranths? (3) What is the domestication syndrome of grain amaranths? (4) Is there consensus on the domestication of grain amaranths?
conclusionsSauer's hypothesis that the three grain amaranths originated from a single ancestor, and that artificial selection combined with hybridization with wild species resulted in the three grain amaranths, is corroborated by most recent authors. There is consensus that the three grain amaranths originated from Amaranthus hybridus. However, it appears that A. hybridus is polyphyletic. Only seed colour is predominantly present in the literature as a character of the grain amaranths domestication syndrome. There is no consensus on the degree of domestication of the grain amaranths. In the literature, there is considerable confusion regarding terminology, the way dates are displayed, concepts and geographical locations. However, we can conclude that there is consensus about the South American Andes and large parts of Mexico as geographical origins of domestication. Without doubt, the lack of good phylogenetic hypotheses for Amaranthus also blurs each attempt to clarify the evolution of the cultivated amaranths from their wild ancestors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.