ArticleJournal of the National Cancer Institute2026
Heuriskance: a novel paradigm for systematic earlier detection of sporadic pancreatic cancer.
Article in Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04662879 (A Prospective Study of Algorithm-based Screening in Patients With Glycemically Defined New Onset Diabetes to Evaluate Risk for and Earlier Detection of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma; Early Detection Initiative), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Prospective Study of Algorithm-based Screening in Patients With Glycemically Defined New Onset Diabetes to Evaluate Risk for and Earlier Detection of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma; Early Detection Initiative (EDI) for Pancreatic Cancer
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Bench to Bedside: The Path Toward Real-World Translation for Artificial Intelligence in Pancreatic Cancer Detection.Korean journal of radiology · 2026Review
- Article
- Development and Validation of a Parsimonious Risk Stratification Model for Pancreatic Cancer.JAMA oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Early detection is key to improving survival and mortality from pancreatic cancer. Traditional periodic screening for cancer in an asymptomatic population is infeasible and not recommended for this low-incidence disease. We describe a novel approach we call "heuriskance" (hyou-ris-kance), wherein a systematic search for and 1-time workup of a "heurisk" (hyou-risk) leads to earlier detection of cancer. A heurisk is an early-warning sign with 3 defining characteristics: (1) the individual has a higher-than-threshold probability of having prevalent invasive cancer, (2) it is associated with a meaningful lead time to diagnosis, and (3) it is identifiable by a systematic and scalable process in the population. Heuriskance aims to systematically detect cancer with clinically meaningful lead time to clinical diagnosis, minimize the proportion of patients with advanced disease, and maximize treatment options, leading to increases in lead time-adjusted 1-, 3-, and 5- year survival. A specific example of a heurisk for pancreatic cancer is glycemically defined new-onset diabetes and the Early Detection Initiative for Pancreatic Cancer (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT04662879) an example of glycemically defined new-onset diabetes-based heuriskance. As heuriskance has no precedent, we provide (1) a tiered risk stratification approach (Define-Enrich-Find), (2) metrics for choosing a heurisk, (3) success metrics for strategy, and (4) phases 1-5 for evaluating the strategy in retrospective and prospective studies. Like all current cancer therapies, heuriskance aims to iteratively improve survival from a fatal disease using a pragmatic, evidence-based, systematic approach to its earlier detection. We apply the concept of heuriskance to pancreatic cancer, but it could be extended to other cancer types.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.