Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41063375›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of language & communication disorders

Be Cognative: Cognates in the Rehabilitation of Cochlear Implant Users with German as a Second Language - A Computer-Based Experiment.

Susann Thyson, Maika Werminghaus, Thomas Klenzner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of language & communication disorders. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Susann ThysonCochlear Implant Center, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-0668-5868
Maika WerminghausCochlear Implant Center, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-5232-0938
Thomas KlenznerCochlear Implant Center, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe rehabilitation of people with cochlear implants (PwCI) who speak more than one language poses significant challenges to healthcare systems, particularly in countries experiencing global migration. This study investigates the potential of cognates (CO) to enhance speech and language therapy for PwCI with German as a second language. A historically underserved group in rehabilitation contexts, speech and language therapy for PwCI speaking German as a second language is often affected by language barriers.

aimThis study aimed to investigate whether PwCI with bi- or multilingual backgrounds show an increased positive selection rate and a reduced latency in understanding auditorily presented CO compared to Non-cognates (NCO), to identify a potential speech and language therapy approach for PwCI in the context of CI rehabilitation. In addition, the study investigated a possible correlation between the level of proficiency in the second language of PwCI and the frequency at which the second language is used in daily life with the selection of CO.

methodA computer-based experiment was conducted using the open-source software PsychoPy. The experiment involved 48 adult multilingual PwCI undergoing outpatient CI rehabilitation. Using a crossover design, participants completed auditory tasks involving CO and NCO at single-word and sentence levels.

resultsThe study involved 48 multilingual PwCI with an average age of 55.7 years who received cochlear implants 66 months previously, on average. Participants spoke languages including Polish, Russian and Turkish, reflecting the linguistic diversity within the German population. The PwCI showed better performance in selecting and processing CO compared to NCO at both the single-word and sentence levels, with significantly faster response times for CO. Daily use of German did not significantly affect CO selection speed at the single-word level, but those who used German more often performed better with CO in sentences. DISCUSSION AND

conclusionThe results suggest that CO are processed faster and more accurately than NCO by multilingual PwCI. This finding highlights the potential of CO in auditory training and speech and language therapy, which is consistent with the existing literature on normal-hearing individuals. CO can enhance comprehension exercises, which are crucial for speech and language therapy, and address the language barriers faced by multilingual PwCI and speech and language therapists. By incorporating exercises focused on CO into therapy, language and comprehension skills essential for multilingual PwCI could be enhanced, potentially improving their hearing abilities. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: What is already known on this subject Prior to our study, it was known that cognate-based interventions in speech therapy for people with normal hearing have shown positive results. However, there has been limited research on the use of cognates in cochlear implant rehabilitation. This study aims to fill existing knowledge gaps and provide new insights that are crucial for optimising hearing rehabilitation strategies in cochlear implant recipients with a multilingual background. What this paper adds to the existing knowledge As a result of this study, we received indications that cognate-focused exercises can improve word and sentence processing in cochlear implant recipients with multilingual backgrounds. These findings highlight the potential of cognates to improve speech and language therapy outcomes. They open up new opportunities for optimising rehabilitation strategies in this population. These findings could lead to tailored interventions that improve comprehension skills for multilingual cochlear implant users. What are the potential or actual clinical implications for this work? The study has clear clinical implications. Integrating cognates into speech and language therapy for multilingual people with cochlear implants may improve their auditory training outcomes. This approach may improve their language processing and communication skills, potentially leading to more effective and personalised rehabilitation strategies.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantationCochlear ImplantsLanguage TherapyMultilingualismSpeech TherapyAdultAgedCross-Over StudiesFemaleGermanyHumansLanguageMaleMiddle AgedSpeech Perceptionaftercarecochlear‐implantationhearing disordersmultilingualismrehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID41063375
PMCPMC12508283

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.