ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2025
The 'leaky pipeline' in orthopaedic surgery: why female trainees drop out?
Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOrthopaedic surgery remains one of the least gender-diverse medical specialties, with women making up a small fraction of practicing surgeons despite increasing female enrolment in medical schools. The "leaky pipeline" phenomenon describes the progressive loss of female trainees due to systemic barriers such as implicit bias, workplace discrimination, inequitable surgical training opportunities, and inadequate work-life balance policies. Understanding the factors contributing to female trainee attrition is essential for fostering gender equity in orthopaedic surgery. MAIN BODY: Female orthopaedic trainees face unique challenges, including stereotypes that question their physical capability, limited access to mentorship and sponsorship, and an unsupportive workplace culture. Many report experiencing discrimination, microaggressions, and exclusion from leadership pathways. Additionally, disparities in surgical case assignments limit skill development and career advancement, further discouraging retention. Work-life balance remains a major concern, as rigid training schedules and insufficient parental leave policies force many female trainees to reconsider their career paths. These systemic barriers contribute to higher attrition rates and hinder efforts to diversify the orthopaedic workforce. To address these issues, institutions must implement targeted reforms. Formal mentorship and sponsorship programs can support female trainees in securing leadership roles and competitive fellowships. Equitable case distribution policies are necessary to ensure fair training opportunities. Institutional commitment to creating inclusive environments through bias training and zero-tolerance policies for discrimination can help improve retention. Additionally, introducing family-friendly policies, such as flexible scheduling and structured parental leave, can make orthopaedic surgery a more viable career choice for women. Early outreach initiatives should also be expanded to encourage female interest in the specialty.
conclusionGender disparities in orthopaedic surgery persist due to longstanding systemic challenges. Without targeted interventions, the leaky pipeline will continue to exclude talented female surgeons, limiting diversity, innovation, and patient care. Institutional commitment to mentorship, equitable training opportunities, and supportive workplace policies is essential for retaining female trainees and achieving gender equity in orthopaedics. Addressing these barriers will ensure that success in the field is determined by skill and dedication rather than gender.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.