Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41063301›Full record

ArticleTrials2025

Determination of the 50% and 95% effective dose of esketamine combined with propofol for intravenous sedation in pediatric circumcision: study protocol for a randomized controlled, double-blind, dose-finding clinical trial.

Junqin Mao, Kang Lin, Xiang Liu, Jie Liu, Gang Liang, Chao Jiang, Zhimin Sheng

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Junqin Mao *Department of Anesthesiology, Wenling Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital, 102, Xiabao Road, Chengdong Street Zhejiang Province, Taizhou, 317500, China.
Kang Lin *Department of Anesthesiology, Wenling First People's Hospital (The Affiliated Wenling Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University), Zhejiang Province, Taizhou, China.
Xiang LiuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Wenling Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital, 102, Xiabao Road, Chengdong Street Zhejiang Province, Taizhou, 317500, China.
Jie LiuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Wenling Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital, 102, Xiabao Road, Chengdong Street Zhejiang Province, Taizhou, 317500, China.
Gang LiangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Wenling Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital, 102, Xiabao Road, Chengdong Street Zhejiang Province, Taizhou, 317500, China.
Chao JiangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Wenling Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital, 102, Xiabao Road, Chengdong Street Zhejiang Province, Taizhou, 317500, China.
Zhimin ShengDepartment of Anesthesiology, Wenling Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital, 102, Xiabao Road, Chengdong Street Zhejiang Province, Taizhou, 317500, China. 2191200789@zju.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3806-9620

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPediatric circumcision is a common yet often distressing procedure due to the associated pain and emotional response it can elicit in children. Adequate sedation and analgesia are critical to mitigate these effects and ensure the procedure's success. The combination of propofol and opioids continues to be the most commonly utilized intravenous anesthetic regimen for pediatric circumcision procedures. However, due to its narrow therapeutic index, propofol may cause notable hemodynamic and respiratory depression. Esketamine, an S(+)-isomer of ketamine, is recognized for its analgesic potency and minimal respiratory impact. Furthermore, its sympathomimetic properties offer a counterbalance to the hemodynamic inhibition of propofol. Therefore, the aim of this study is to determine the optimal dose of esketamine combined with propofol for pediatric circumcision.

methodsThis prospective, randomized controlled, dose-finding clinical trial will enroll 100 children aged 3-9 years who undergo circumcision. Participants will be randomly assigned to five groups to receive varying doses of esketamine (0.50, 0.75, 1.00, 1.25, and 1.50 mg/kg) combined with 3 mg/kg propofol for achieving adequate sedation. An effective dose of esketamine will be defined as non-occurrence of physical movement, frowning, or Ramsay Sedation Scale (RSS) score ≥ 5 during skin incision. The values for median effective dose (ED DISCUSSION: The results of this study seek to determine the ED

trial registrationChinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2400090035. Registered on September 23, 2024.

Indexed as

Anesthetics, IntravenousCircumcision, MaleHypnotics and SedativesKetaminePropofolChildChild, PreschoolDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodHumansMaleProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeAnesthetics, IntravenousEsketamineHypnotics and SedativesKetaminePropofol95% effective doseCircumcisionDose-findingEsketamineMedian effective dosePediatricPropofol

Identifiers

PMID41063301
PMCPMC12505548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.