Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41063276›Full record

ArticleNutrition journal2025

Acute effects of almond milk vs. almond milk supplemented with almond protein powder or whey protein on plasma amino acid profiles and hydration status in postmenopausal women: a randomised crossover study protocol.

Vy Tran, Michael Tieland, SzeYen Tan, Jackson Fyfe, Simon A Feros, Rhiannon Snipe, Giselle Allsopp, Clinton R Bruce, Greg M Kowalski, Shaun Mason and 5 more

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrition journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Vy TranInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Faculty of Health, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, 3216, Australia.
Michael TielandInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Faculty of Health, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, 3216, Australia.
SzeYen TanInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Faculty of Health, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, 3216, Australia.
Jackson FyfeInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Faculty of Health, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, 3216, Australia.
Simon A FerosInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Faculty of Health, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, 3216, Australia.
Rhiannon SnipeInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Faculty of Health, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, 3216, Australia.
Giselle AllsoppInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Faculty of Health, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, 3216, Australia.
Clinton R BruceInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Faculty of Health, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, 3216, Australia.
Greg M KowalskiInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Metabolic Research Unit, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Waurn Ponds, Geelong, VIC, 3216, Australia.
Shaun MasonInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Faculty of Health, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, 3216, Australia.
Amelia J CarrInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Faculty of Health, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, 3216, Australia.
Gavin AbbottInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Faculty of Health, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, 3216, Australia.
Lee D HamiltonInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Faculty of Health, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, 3216, Australia.
Zoya HuschtschaInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Faculty of Health, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, 3216, Australia.
Charles S UrwinInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Faculty of Health, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, 3216, Australia. c.urwin@deakin.edu.au.

Funding

Almond Board of California 66500 Research-Nutrition
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPostmenopausal women experience hormonal changes that negatively impact muscle mass, hydration, and metabolic health. Optimising protein intake during this life stage can mitigate musculoskeletal function declines, yet many consume inadequate protein. As interest grows in choosing sustainable, plant-based alternatives over animal protein, almond protein powder (APP), a by-product of almond oil extraction, presents a novel option for consumers. Differing from a protein isolate, APP retains fat, fibre, and micronutrients, which may influence its potential for promoting muscle protein synthesis and hydration. However, little is known about APP's acute physiological effects, or perceived responses such as fullness/satiety, taste or gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms. This study aims to investigate the postprandial amino acid, glycaemic, insulinemic, hydration, and perceived responses to APP in postmenopausal women, comparing it to a whey protein supplement. Findings will inform tailored supplementation strategies for an underrepresented and nutritionally vulnerable population in the future.

methodsThis protocol paper details a randomised, crossover study of 14 postmenopausal women, assessing the acute amino acid profile and hydration responses in postmenopausal women following ingestion of APP as compared to whey protein, water or almond milk. Venous blood, urine and questionnaires are to be collected during each session for 180 min post-ingestion. Primary outcomes include aminoacidemia (total amino acids, as well as all 20 individual primary amino acids) and hydration markers (urine volume excreted, body mass, plasma volume, urine specific gravity, urine colour, plasma osmolality, fluid retention). Secondary outcomes include perceived appetite, thirst, gastrointestinal symptoms, and supplement tolerability and acceptability. Between-treatment comparisons will be made using linear mixed models with a fixed effect of treatment and a random intercept for participant. DISCUSSION: The study strengths include a focus on postmenopausal women, an underrepresented group in clinical and nutrition research who are susceptible to problems with muscle function and hydration. The use of a randomised crossover design to reduce inter-individual variability strengthens this study further. A combination of objective measures and subjective responses offers insights into both physiological effects and consumer acceptability of APP versus whey protein. Hydration assessment is particularly relevant given the postmenopausal population can be at increased risk of fluid imbalance. Acute measurement of responses to APP limit the transferability to longer-term supplementation, and there are some inherent macronutrient discrepancies between treatments which may influence glycaemic and insulinemic responses to supplementation.

trial registrationDUHREC: 2024/HE000669, ANZCTR: ACTRN12625000127404p.

Indexed as

Amino AcidsDietary SupplementsMilkPlant ProteinsPostmenopausePrunus dulcisWhey ProteinsAgedAnimalsBlood GlucoseCross-Over StudiesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPowdersRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAmino AcidsBlood GlucosePlant ProteinsPowdersWhey ProteinsAlmond proteinDietary fibreDietary supplementationHydrationPlant-basedPostmenopausal women

Identifiers

PMID41063276
PMCPMC12509418

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.