Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41063274›Full record

ReviewTropical medicine and health2025

A step-by-step guide for conducting an umbrella review.

Mohammed Abdellatif, Mohammad Najm Dadam, Nguyen Tuan Vu, Nguyen Hai Nam, Nguyen Quoc Hoan, Zahraa Taoube, Phillip Tran, Nguyen Tien Huy

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Tropical medicine and health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mohammed AbdellatifPediatric and Neonatology Specialist, Muscat Private Hospital, Muscat, Oman. abd.el.latef.mohammed@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6872-8426
Mohammad Najm DadamOnline Research Club, Nagasaki, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8814-0205
Nguyen Tuan VuOnline Research Club, Nagasaki, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5822-6393
Nguyen Hai NamOnline Research Club, Nagasaki, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5184-6936
Nguyen Quoc HoanOnline Research Club, Nagasaki, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9248-9004
Zahraa TaoubeOnline Research Club, Nagasaki, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-1825-0465
Phillip TranInvasive Cardiology, Nam Can Tho University, Can Tho, Vietnam.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3329-2276
Nguyen Tien HuyInstitute of Research and Development, Duy Tan University, Da Nang, Vietnam. nguyentienhuy4@duytan.edu.vn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9543-9440

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe rapid increase in published research poses challenges for healthcare professionals aiming to stay updated. While systematic reviews help synthesize findings, their abundance can overwhelm readers. Umbrella reviews address this by summarizing multiple systematic reviews, offering a comprehensive perspective on specific topics.

methodsThis article offers a practical, step-by-step guide for conducting an umbrella review, aimed at researchers and clinicians alike.

resultsUmbrella reviews effectively integrate data from systematic reviews, ensuring clearer evidence synthesis. Tools like Rayyan and Covidence streamline processes such as screening and data extraction. Strategies for managing overlapping studies and assessing methodological quality enhance the validity of findings.

conclusionUmbrella reviews are invaluable for evidence-based decision-making, especially in healthcare. This guide equips researchers and clinicians with a structured approach to navigate and synthesize the growing body of systematic reviews, fostering reliable and actionable insights.

Indexed as

Evidence-based practiceEvidence synthesisMeta-reviewsReview of reviewsUmbrella review

Identifiers

PMID41063274
PMCPMC12509336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.