Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41063230›Full record

ReviewActa neuropathologica communications2025

New experimental therapies for glioblastoma: a review of preclinical research.

Arseniy E Yuzhalin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Acta neuropathologica communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Arseniy E YuzhalinResearch Center for Translational Medicine, Sirius University of Science and Technology, Sochi, Russia. yuzhalin@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glioblastoma is the most common and malignant glial tumor of the central nervous system with an incidence from 0.59 to 3.69 per 100 000 depending on the region. Patient prognosis remains poor, highlighting the urgent need for novel therapies. This review analyzes preclinical studies published in the past seven years, covering a broad spectrum of experimental therapies, including small molecules, energy-based interventions, immunotherapies, gene and cell-based treatments, and tumor microenvironment–targeting approaches. I evaluate therapeutic efficacy, experimental models, and translational potential, and discuss key limitations and opportunities in the current research landscape. Finally, I outline future directions to enhance the clinical relevance of preclinical findings and accelerate the development of effective therapies for glioblastoma.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGlioblastomaAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsHumansImmunotherapyTumor MicroenvironmentAntineoplastic AgentsBrain tumorCancerExperimental researchGlioblastomaMouse modelsTherapy

Identifiers

PMID41063230
PMCPMC12509385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.