ArticleBMC medicine2025
Healthcare access among sub-Saharan migrants and refugees in Tunisia: an interpretative qualitative study.
Article in BMC medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTunisia, situated at the crossroads of North Africa and Europe, has increasingly become an important origin, destination, and transit point for sub-Saharan migrants and refugees in recent decades. Despite growing migration flows, there remains a paucity of research on how these populations navigate healthcare access in Tunisia. This study addresses this gap by exploring migrants' experiences with and perceptions of Tunisia's healthcare system, with a focus on barriers to and facilitators of healthcare.
methodsA qualitative study was conducted in four urban areas (Tunis, Medenine, Sousse, and Sfax) with concentrated migrant populations between May and December 2023. A purposive sample of migrants, migrant community leaders, and nongovernmental organization (NGO) staff were engaged through semi-structured interviews and focus-group discussions. Data were analysed via thematic analysis, combining inductive and deductive coding via NVivo 14 software, guided by an adaptation of Levesque's conceptual framework.
resultsIn total, 120 migrants and 43 NGO staff members participated in the study. The participants identified structural barriers such as legal status limitations, language barriers, and financial constraints, as well as social and cultural issues such as stigma and distrust of health system. While informal networks provide critical health information, they often lead to fragmented care. The private sector was perceived as better quality but unaffordable for the majority of migrants. Key facilitators included NGO support for referrals and coordination, particularly for undocumented migrants. Access was further hindered by communication gaps and limited awareness of the healthcare process.
conclusionsOur study underscores the complex interplay of structural and individual barriers to accessing healthcare for migrants in Tunisia. Addressing these challenges requires culturally sensitive policies, multilingual resources, simplified administrative processes, and expanded health insurance coverage. Strengthening collaboration between NGOs, healthcare providers, and policymakers is essential to ensure equitable healthcare access for migrants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.