ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2025
Voices across difference: a qualitative exploration of health-promoting dialogues between older migrant women and researchers in Norway.
Article in International journal for equity in health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic underscored the urgent need for more equitable and inclusive health research, particularly focusing on groups underrepresented in public health development, such as older migrant women. Despite increasing population diversity in high-income countries, little research focuses on the health needs and challenges of this group in an inclusive manner. To address this gap, older migrant women and researchers in a Norwegian city participated in sustained health-promoting dialogues over one year. These dialogues aimed to enhance health knowledge among the women and to increase researchers’ awareness of the women’s lived experiences and challenges. Guided by the concept of health-promoting dialogues and health promotion, this qualitative study explored how both groups experienced this dialogue process.
methodsData were collected through individual in-depth interviews with eight older migrant women and seven researchers and analyzed thematically.
resultsThe analysis identified three main themes: knowledge gain by both groups, dynamics of collaboration, and significance of power dynamics, with related subthemes. Findings show that health-promoting dialogues were experienced as mutually enriching, enabling both groups to acquire new knowledge. Older migrant women developed a deeper understanding of their health conditions and their vital role in contributing to the research while researchers gained more insight into the women´s challenges and strengths. However, persistent language barriers shaped the dynamics of communication in complex ways for both groups.
conclusionThe study highlights that health-promoting dialogues between researchers and marginalized populations fosters collaboration, mutual learning, trust, and empowerment, highlighting the potential of facilitating such dialogues as a framework for inclusive and health promotion research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.