Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41063206›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2025

Understanding challenges in healthcare access: qualitative insights from healthcare providers and people living in socio-economically vulnerable circumstances.

Emilie Op de Beeck, Hannah Ledegen, Gytha Slechten, Josefien Van Olmen, Hans De Loof, Hilde Bastiaens, Caroline Masquillier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for equity in health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Emilie Op de BeeckFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Primary care and interdisciplinary care, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium. emilie.opdebeeck@uantwerpen.be.
Hannah LedegenFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Primary care and interdisciplinary care, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Gytha SlechtenFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Primary care and interdisciplinary care, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Josefien Van OlmenFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Primary care and interdisciplinary care, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Hans De LoofFaculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, laboratory of physio- pharmacology, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Hilde Bastiaens *Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Primary care and interdisciplinary care, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Caroline Masquillier *Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Primary care and interdisciplinary care, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.

Funding

Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek S006123N
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEquitable access to healthcare is fundamental to improving population health outcomes, yet persistent disparities leave many underserved, particularly those in socio-economically vulnerable circumstances. In Belgium, unmet healthcare needs are disproportionately concentrated among low-income groups, migrants and individuals with low educational attainment. These structural inequities are reflected in poorer health outcomes, including reduced life expectancy and limited access to essential services such as dental, mental, and specialist care. Existing research has primarily taken cross-sectional approaches, failing to capture how barriers accumulate over time. To address this gap, this study adopts a longitudinal perspective to explore the cumulative nature of healthcare access barriers among socio-economically vulnerable populations in Belgium. It also incorporates the perspectives of both patients and healthcare providers.

methodA qualitative longitudinal approach using semi-structured interviews at three time-points with 16 people living in socio-economically circumstances was conducted. In the same period, 17 semi-structured interviews with healthcare providers (HCPs), such as general practitioners (GPs), dentists, pharmacists and psychologists were carried out. The sampling strategy included a combination of purposive and snowball sampling. Interviews were audiotaped and transcribed, then reflexive thematic analysis was carried out to ensure a transparent and rigorous analysis.

resultsThe study revealed that barriers to accessing care accumulate over time, particularly in the context of a fragmented healthcare system. Individuals living in socio-economically vulnerable circumstances often deprioritise their healthcare and need to repeatedly navigate the healthcare access continuum to address different health concerns, often involving multiple healthcare providers. Each iteration can introduce new provider-specific barriers, compounding the challenges and increasing the complexity of accessing healthcare. Participants with an informal social network or support from HCPs and societal organisations could temporarily overcome the barriers to access care.

conclusionThe study reveals the complex and cumulative barriers to healthcare access for socio-economically vulnerable individuals, including competing priorities, system fragmentation, and cultural and language challenges. While informal social networks provide some support, they are insufficient to address systemic issues. Integrating these networks with formal community outreach initiatives could improve coordination and access to healthcare.

Indexed as

Healthcare DisparitiesHealth PersonnelHealth Services AccessibilityVulnerable PopulationsAdultAgedBelgiumFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchSocioeconomic FactorsAccess to healthcareBarriersLongitudinal qualitative researchSocio-economically vulnerable people

Identifiers

PMID41063206
PMCPMC12505574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.