ArticleBMC medical ethics2025
Moral disengagement in critical care nurses: a conventional content analysis.
Article in BMC medical ethics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGiven the high-stakes environment of intensive care units, understanding how nurses navigate moral challenges and engage in ethical decision-making is critical for maintaining patient safety and care quality. One important process in this field is moral disengagement, which is growing in the nursing literature. However, there is a lack of foundational and qualitative studies addressing this issue. This study presents a qualitative content analysis aimed at exploring moral disengagement among nurses working in intensive care units.
methodThis qualitative study employed conventional content analysis from June to December 2024 in Tehran, Iran. Purposive sampling was used to recruit participants. Data were collected using in-depth, unstructured interviews at the beginning, followed by semi-structured interviews. Sampling continued until data saturation was reached, resulting in 30 interviews with 25 eligible intensive care unit nurses. The conventional qualitative content analysis approach developed by Graneheim and Lundman was employed.
resultsThree main categories with eight subcategories were identified from the initial 765 codes. The findings revealed three main categories: "cognitive justification of unethical behavior," "protective strategies for personal security," and "normalization of unconventional practices." These categories include subcategories such as "externalization of responsibility," "moral-cognitive justification," "positive reframing of the event," "preservation of job position and security," "psychological stabilization," "strategic violation of regulations for survival," "reduction of emotional and psychological pressure," and "protective framing of behavior."
conclusionThis study reveals various aspects of moral disengagement among critical care nurses, which can pave the way for future studies to better understand the phenomenon, its related factors, and help with the development of preventive measures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.