ArticleBMC palliative care2025
Developing supportive policy environments for hospice care in china: a quantitative policy evaluation based on the PMC-Index model.
Article in BMC palliative care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Aggressive end-of-life care among over half a million patients with cancer in Shandong, China, 2017-2022.Journal of global health · 2026Article
- From cultural constraints to structural resilience: a comparative analysis of end-of-life care policies in China, South Korea, the U.S., and the U.K.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Multi-Sensory Comfort Care in Hospice Wards: A Qualitative Study of Healthcare Professionals' Experiences and Challenges.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Article
- Evaluating quality of care for dying patients from the perspective of bereaved relatives: validation of the Chinese version of the international care of the dying evaluation.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPublic policies play a crucial role in enhancing practical hospice care services and have attracted significant attention in China in recent years. However, there is a lack of research systematically evaluating hospice care policies from an empirical perspective.
objectivesTo address this gap, we aimed to define and assess overall and individual indicators of hospice care policy importance, coherence, and performance in central, provincial, and local government policy guidelines in China.
methodsWe applied content analysis and text mining to 112 hospice care policy documents. Using the Policy Modeling Consistency Index (PMC-Index) model, we developed a comprehensive evaluation framework comprising 10 primary and 47 secondary indicators. Subsequently, we quantitatively evaluated 18 selected policy samples through both multidimensional holistic and individual-sample analyses, and examined improvement trends in three national-level stand-alone hospice care strategies.
resultsThe average PMC-Index score of the 18 selected policy samples was 7.20 (out of 10.00), indicating a Good level of consistency. Two policies achieved an Excellent rating, eight were rated as Good, six Acceptable, and two Low. In terms of the 10 policy dimensions, Policy nature (X1) and Policy tools (X3) exhibited excellent performance, whereas Policy equity (X6) and Policy guarantee (X8) showed unsatisfactory performance. Notably, all three national-level stand-alone strategies were rated at the Good level and demonstrated improvements across different pilot periods.
conclusionsHospice care policies in China are considered comprehensive and rational, yet they have the potential for further improvement, especially in the areas of policy equity, guarantee of implementation, timeliness coordination, and multi-agent collaboration. Moreover, a series of practical national strategies play a significant role in the policy system. These findings offer valuable insights into the strengths and limitations of China’s hospice care policies, particularly from perspectives of policy equity and policy innovation. This serves as a reference for establishing a supportive policy environment conducive to the high-quality development of hospice care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.