Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41063132›Full record

ArticleBMC oral health2025

Evaluation of aging effects on the physical, chemical, and mechanical properties of thermoplastic materials for orthodontic clear aligners: an in vivo study.

Fatemeh Arabpour, Hossein Agha Aghili, Maryam Javaheri Mahd, Zahra Arabpour, Soghra Yasaei

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Fatemeh Arabpour *Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Arak University of Medical Sciences, Arak, Iran. fatemeharabpour8@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9803-7255
Hossein Agha Aghili *Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.
Maryam Javaheri MahdDepartment of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.
Zahra ArabpourStudent Research Committee, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6880-7930
Soghra YasaeiDepartment of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDue to the viscoelasticity of orthodontic thermoplastic materials, the force generated by the orthodontic device for the same deformation will decline over time. Aligners are continually exposed to saliva at a constant body temperature, which can have an adverse effect on the chemical composition of the polymers. More studies are needed to investigate the in vivo aging of other materials, to determine the Best material that could meet treatment needs. We show the comparison of physical, chemical, and mechanical changes of clear aligners before and after 10 days of intraoral usage.

methodsTwenty-five unused aligners and twenty-five aligners used in the oral environment were first gathered from five patients requiring clear aligners and then subjected to water absorption and solubility, tensile strength, modulus of elasticity, and Chemical properties testing. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov (K-S) test was used to compare the equality of distributions. The Wilcoxon test was used to determine the median difference by time. Data were analyzed in R-4.4.1 using the ggstatsplot package and ggwithinstats function. The results with p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant for all tests.

resultsThe mean water solubility (Wsl) was zero (before using aligners) and 0.00013 (after using aligners), indicating an insignificant difference between the two time periods (p = 0.150). The mean Max Force (N) was 97.105 (before using aligners) and 111.18 (after using aligners), implying an insignificant difference between the two time periods (p = 0.640). Similarly, the mean normalized displacement (%) was 123.56 (before using aligners) and 122.08 (after using aligners), indicating an insignificant difference between the two time periods (p = 0.290). The chemical composition analysis revealed the hydrolysis of ester bonds to carboxylic acid and alcohol functional groups post-treatment.

conclusionThe aligners' mechanical and physical properties are not significantly affected, but their chemical properties can be altered with aging.

Indexed as

Dental MaterialsOrthodontic Appliances, RemovablePlasticsAdultElasticityElastic ModulusFemaleHumansMaleMaterials TestingSolubilityTensile StrengthViscosityWaterDental MaterialsPlasticsWaterAgingChemical propertiesClear alignersMechanical propertiesPhysical properties

Identifiers

PMID41063132
PMCPMC12505764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.