Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41063111›Full record

ArticleBMC women's health2025

Endometriosis, symptoms, and risk for depression and/or anxiety: a population-based retrospective study.

Emma Goodwin, Helena Abreu do Valle, Amanda S Nitschke, Joseph H Puyat, Paul J Yong, Gillian E Hanley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC women's health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Emma GoodwinDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Division of Gynaecologic Oncology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Helena Abreu do ValleDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Division of Gynaecologic Oncology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Amanda S NitschkeDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Division of Gynaecologic Oncology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Joseph H PuyatSchool of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Paul J YongDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Division of Gynaecologic Oncology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Gillian E HanleyDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Division of Gynaecologic Oncology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada. gillian.hanley@ubc.ca.

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research,Canada CGSM 6556
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEndometriosis is a chronic and inflammatory condition that often presents with chronic pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea, and dyspareunia, thus having important effects on quality of life. There are two proposed hypotheses to describe the known association between endometriosis and depression and anxiety: (1) the disease hypothesis, where the inflammatory nature of endometriosis is driving increased risk for depression and anxiety; and (2) the pain hypothesis, where it is the painful symptoms underlying the increased risk. We aimed to shed further light on these two hypotheses by assessing the risk for depression and/or anxiety in three groups of patients pathologically assessed for endometriosis: symptomatic endometriosis patients (Symp Endo), symptomatic patients with no pathological endometriosis diagnosis (Symp No Endo), and asymptomatic endometriosis patients (Asymp Endo).

methodsThis study included pathologically-confirmed endometriosis patients identified from the pathology records of Vancouver Coastal Health Authority between 2000 and 2008. These data were linked with population-based administrative health data for follow-up to 2017. Depression and anxiety were identified through diagnostics codes from health services use data and prescriptions for antidepressants. Bivariate analyses were performed to assess differences between groups. Cox proportional hazards models were run to generate hazard ratios for incident depression and/or anxiety between the groups.

resultsThere were 2729 people in Symp Endo, 585 in Symp No Endo, and 326 in Asymp Endo. Symp No Endo was more likely than Symp Endo to be visiting a physician for pelvic pain and to be taking prescription-level pain medications (p < 0.001). After adjusting for several covariates, Symp No Endo had a significantly higher risk of incident depression and/or anxiety (adjusted HR: 1.23, 95% CI: 1.06-1.41) compared to Symp Endo. There was no statistically significant difference in risk of depression and/or anxiety between Symp Endo and Asymp Endo (adjusted HR: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.76-1.17).

conclusionsThese results point toward the pain focused hypotheses as Symp No Endo patients were at higher risk for depression/anxiety than the Symp Endo group. However, the results also suggest the disease hypothesis is at play, because the Symp Endo and Asymp Endo groups were at the same level of risk for depression/anxiety.

Indexed as

AnxietyDepressionEndometriosisAdultFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPelvic PainProportional Hazards ModelsQuality of LifeRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsAnxietyAsymptomaticChronic painDepressionEndometriosisInflammation

Identifiers

PMID41063111
PMCPMC12509389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.