Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41063100›Full record

SynthesisBMC musculoskeletal disorders2025

The effects of combined calcium and vitamin D supplementation on bone mineral density and fracture risk in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Bo Cong, Haiguang Zhang

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Comparison of vitamin D, parathyroid hormone (PTH), and bone metabolism markers in hip fracture patients by fracture type and control group.Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Bo CongDepartment of orthopaedics, Yantaishan Hospital; Yantaishan Hospital Affiliated to Binzhou Medical University, Yantai Key Laboratory for Repair and Reconstruction of Bone and Joint, No.10087, Science and Technology Avenue, Laishan District, Yantai City, 264003, China.
Haiguang ZhangDepartment of orthopaedics, Yantaishan Hospital; Yantaishan Hospital Affiliated to Binzhou Medical University, Yantai Key Laboratory for Repair and Reconstruction of Bone and Joint, No.10087, Science and Technology Avenue, Laishan District, Yantai City, 264003, China. zhg10087@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis systematic review and meta-analysis assesses the efficacy of combined calcium and vitamin D supplementation on bone mineral density (BMD) and fracture risk among postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.

methodsWe conducted a comprehensive search across multiple medical databases including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, collecting randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published from database inception to present. Data extraction and analysis were performed to calculate standardized mean differences (SMDs) or risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), which were then presented in forest plots.

resultsEleven RCTs with 43,869 participants were included. Combined supplementation modestly improved BMD at the pelvis (SMD = 0.20, 95% CI: 0.05–0.35, p = 0.01) without significant changes in BMD at the lumbar spine, femoral neck, or total hip. The overall fracture risk was not significantly reduced (RR = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.89–1.07, p = 0.68). Subgroup analyses revealed improvements in serum 25‑hydroxyvitamin D levels (25OHD), especially in participants with baseline deficiencies (Z = 10.48, p < 0.001). No dose-response effect was noted for supplementation duration. Fracture outcomes from three large trials (> 42 000 participants) yielded a neutral effect on any clinical fracture (pooled RR = 0.95; 95% CI 0.85–1.07; Z = 1.08, P = 0.28; I² = 0%). Sensitivity analyses affirmed the findings’ stability, with no evident publication bias.

conclusionCombined calcium and vitamin D supplementation may improve pelvic BMD and correct serum 25OHD deficiencies in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, but does not reduce clinical fracture risk in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Larger, highdose RCTs with rigorous adherence monitoring and adjudicated fracture endpoints are warranted. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Indexed as

Bone DensityBone Density Conservation AgentsCalciumDietary SupplementsOsteoporosis, PostmenopausalOsteoporotic FracturesVitamin DCalcium, DietaryDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRisk FactorsTreatment OutcomeBone Density Conservation AgentsCalciumCalcium, DietaryVitamin DBone mineral densityCalcium supplementationFracture riskOsteoporosisPostmenopausal womenVitamin D supplementation

Identifiers

PMID41063100
PMCPMC12506016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.