ArticleBMC public health2025
Young adults not in education, employment, or training (NEET): a global scoping review.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessing the associated factors of anxiety and depression among the adult population to harness the demographic dividend in Nepal using the socio-ecological model.Discover mental health · 2026Article
- Development and validation of the Korea University Social Isolation Scale.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Sex-specific clinical profiles and long-term outcomes in adolescents and young people at clinical high risk for psychosis: Findings from the PARMS program.European child & adolescent psychiatry · 2026Article
- Effects of an App-Based Intervention on Psychological Well-Being Among Young Individuals not in Employment, Education, or Training With and Those Without Disability: Subgroup Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR pediatrics and parenting · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundYoung adults not in education, employment, or training (NEET) represent a significant global issue, with varying challenges across different countries. Research indicates a strong association between NEET status and negative outcomes such as mental health difficulties, low self-esteem, and social exclusion, though the direction of causality is often complex and bidirectional. This scoping review aimed to provide a comprehensive mapping of international research on NEETs, including risk factors, characteristics, and effective interventions to inform future policy and practice.
methodsThis scoping review was conducted following the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) framework, incorporating the PRISMA-ScR checklist. The review included six key stages: identifying the research question, identifying relevant studies, selecting studies, charting the data, collating, Summarizing, and reporting the results, and consultation. A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, covering literature from 2021 to April 2024. Eligibility criteria were established using the population-concept-context (PCC) framework.
resultsA total of 159 studies were included, classified into 11 topics. The review identified a diverse range of factors that influence the status of NEET, including individual, family, and systemic elements. Key determinants such as cognitive abilities, noncognitive skills, and socioeconomic background were highlighted. Psychological issues, including mental health problems and low self-esteem, were prevalent among NEETs. Social issues such as inequality, discrimination, and social exclusion were also significant. The review found that NEET status is associated with long-term socioeconomic disadvantages, including lower educational attainment, higher unemployment rates, and increased mental health risks. The effectiveness of the interventions varied, some showing positive outcomes in terms of employment and mental health, while others had limited impact.
conclusionsThe NEET phenomenon is complex and requires a holistic approach that integrates the health, welfare and work life sectors. Effective interventions should be tailored to the specific needs of NEET individuals, considering their mental health, self-esteem, and social connections. Policymakers should focus on developing comprehensive support systems that address the diverse challenges faced by NEETs, ensuring sustainable transitions to education, employment, or training. More research is needed to explore the long-term effectiveness of various interventions and to identify best practices to support NEETs worldwide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.