ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2025
Comparison of muscle activation and proprioception during landing at different angles between individuals with chronic ankle instability and healthy controls.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Neuromuscular characteristics of individuals with chronic ankle instability during unilateral landing tasks: a meta-analysis of electromyographic studies.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026Pooled it
- Ankle Kinematics and Neuromuscular Activity During the Stair-to-Ground Transition in Individuals With Acute Ankle Sprain: A Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of foot and ankle research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundChronic Ankle Instability (CAI) is associated with proprioceptive deficits and altered neuromuscular control, yet limited studies have examined these factors concurrently during functional tasks like jump-landing.
methodsA total of 44 participants, including 21 healthy individuals and 23 with CAI, participated in a crossover experimental study. An EMG system (Noraxon, USA) was used bilaterally to assess muscle activation of the key muscles involved in ankle movement during jump-landing activities. Specifically, medial gastrocnemius (MG) and tibialis anterior (TA) muscles were evaluated. To identify differences in The Ankle Inversion Discrimination Apparatus for Landing (AIDAL) parameters between groups, an independent samples t-test was conducted. Linear mixed modeling with repeated measures was performed to analyze muscle activation differences during jump-landing at different angles.
resultsIndividuals with CAI exhibited significantly lower AIDAL slope estimates compared to healthy controls, with a moderate effect size (p < 0.001, d = 0.78). In the EMG results, no statistically significant difference was observed between the CAI group and healthy controls (p = 0.431) for TA and (p = 0.699) for MG. Statistically significant differences were found in the activation of the MG muscle between 10
conclusionThis study indicates that individuals with CAI experience impaired proprioception compared to healthy individuals, while showing no notable differences in key muscle activation patterns. It highlights the necessity of rehabilitation strategies focused on proprioception.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.