ArticleBMC public health2025
Expanded voluntary counselling and testing services in Türkiye: insights from an HIV model.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundVoluntary Counselling and Testing (VCT) centres provide free and anonymous Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) testing along with counselling services. They remove barriers to testing and lead to higher HIV awareness. The current healthcare system in Türkiye achieves high treatment rates in the continuum of care. However, the estimated diagnosis rates are far below the global targets, posing a significant challenge. This also creates an opportunity to intensify prevention efforts against the burden of the disease. Expanded VCT services is a suggested strategy for Türkiye, but research evaluating its effectiveness is lacking.
methodsWe developed a dynamic compartmental model with different testing sites as separate compartments, distinguishing VCT centres from others. Using the data from each VCT centre, we quantified the impact of this strategy through various scenarios.
resultsWe found that under the assumption that the VCT strategy primarily serves high-risk populations, it could yield 50 to 74-fold more pay-off in terms of the number of cases prevented per additional test than other facilities. A two- and four-fold increase in both types of testing facilities (VCT and other) would reduce annual incidence in 2033 by 71% and 91%, respectively, while prevalence was estimated to be 34% and 51% lower compared to no action.
conclusionsOur findings suggest that prioritizing VCT expansion is highly efficient strategy compared to other testing sites. Future research could focus on resource allocation, costs and benefits of the programs to ensure the optimal allocation of the resources to the most cost-effective public health strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.